Page 42 - Insurance Times December 2018
P. 42

of giving such discharge without the concurrence  As  per  the  already  circulated  &  implied  "Insurance
                 of the others or until the disability has ceased.  Ombudsman Rules, 2017" - Insurance Ombudsman has
                 Explanation I:-this section applies to a discharge  given the authority to decide the wording of the policy and
                 from every kind of liability, including a liability in  whether the policy term is a condition precedent or a
                 respect of any immovable property.           condition, here in such cases only Insurance Ombudsman
                                                              may be allowed to decide or determine how a claim will be
                 Explanation II:- for the purposes of this section, the
                 Manager of a Hindu undivided family governed by  treated if it is made outside of the time limit.
                 the Mitakshara law shall be deemed to be capable
                 of giving a discharge without the concurrence of  Additionally,  the  IRDAI  through  its  Circulars  dated  20
                 the other members of the family only if he is in  September 2011, 28 October 2016 and 28 June 2017, has
                 management of the joint family property.     mandated that insurers should not deny the claims on a
                                                              mechanical basis citing the delay in notification.
             (7) Special exceptions: - nothing in earlier sections
                 applies to suits to enforce rights of pre-emption,
                                                              However, the courts in India do not seem to have developed
                 or shall be deemed to extend, for more than three
                 years from the cessation of the disability or the  a unified approach with respect to the consequences of
                 death of the person affected thereby, the period  delays in notification. The Supreme Court bench in Om
                                                              Prakash vs. Reliance General Insurance and Anr (Civil Appeal
                 of limitation for any suit or application.
                                                              No 15611 of 2017, decided on 4 October 2017) held that
             (8) Continuous running of time: - Where once time has  the delay in informing the insurance company would not
                 begun to run, no subsequent disability or inability
                                                              debar the insured from getting the insurance claim.
                 to institute a suit or make an application stops it:
                 Provided that, where letters of administration to  This  view  goes  against  the  previous  judgement  of
                 the estate of a creditor have been granted to his
                                                              another two Judge bench of the Supreme Court in Oriental
                 debtor, the running of the period of limitation for
                                                              Insurance Co Ltd vs. Parvesh Chander Chadha (Civil Appeal
                 a suit to recover the debt shall be suspended while
                 the administration continues.                No 6739 of 2010, decided on 17 August 2010) where the
                                                              verdict  took  the  view  that  the  claim  deserved  to  be
         Obviously the dire need of the current era in India for any  repudiated because of a delay in informing the insurance
         insured - as the mandatory market practice: It is thus very  company.
         much evident that this Law of Limitation in our current
         Indian Insurance market needs to be properly understood  Taking note of these conflicting views, recently the Supreme
         by  each  and  all  the  insured  always  while  availing the  Court Judge, in its order dated 9 January 2018 passed in
         coverage  under  various  insurance  policies  under  the  Gurshinder Singh vs. Sriram General Insurance Co Ltd (SLP
         different lines of available insurance businesses like, Fire,  No 24370/2015), has referred this issue to a three Judges'
         Motor, Health, Marine - whatever you think of taking from  bench and now being in their active consideration.
         any insurance company for your insurance requirements -
         as it is the main key to win over your insurers in all your  References:
         Insurance related claims being reactive always being within
                                                              Different  contemporary  discussions  &  information  as
         the requisite time period.
                                                              collected & collated from various text materials / online
         Final issue comes here - "Is there a time limit outside of
         which the insured is barred from making a claim in this  Ans. of November'18 Insurance Quiz contest
         current Indian insurance market?"
                                                               1.  Bajaj General Insurance
         It is sure and certain that the claims and circumstances of  2.  Apollo Munich Health Insurance
         claims must be invariably notified by the insured to the  3.  1100 Crore
         respective insurers within the time period specified in the  4.  1/11/2018
         insurance policy. This could be a specified number of days,  5.  M G Diwan
                                                               6.  Risk Management Association of India
         as soon as practicable, within the policy period or the
         extended reporting period specified in the insurance policy.  7.  $16 trillion


          42  The Insurance Times, December 2018
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47