Page 23 - RMAI July-September 2018
P. 23

July - September 2018






        interest of the employees   in India the Workmen's  Imprudent  expansion  resulting  in  a  loss  (xi)  Using
        Compensation  Act  now  changed  as  Employees  inside  information  (xii)  Unwarranted  dividend
        Compensation Act, 2011 requires most employers to  payment, salaries or compensation (xiii) Misleading
        compensate employees to medical expenses and loss  statements  filed  with  the  Stock  exchange  (xiv)
        of income due to injuries or certain diseases arising  Misrepresentation in acquisition agreement for the
        from their employment. The family of an employee  purchase  of  another  Company  (xv)  Wrongful
        who  dies  as  a  result  of  job  oriented  accident  or  dismissal of an employee.
        disease also collects a specified amount.
                                                              KEY-PERSON LOSSES :
        Directors and Officers Liability :
                                                              The most valuable asset of any organization is their
        The  Corporate  decisions  that  yesterday  did  not   people – especially those key persons whose skills,
        materially  affect  other  people  today  powerfully   knowledge or special qualities are not easily replaced.
        impinge on their lives and the subject matter has a   Loss of the services of a key person – through death,
        direct bearing on the potential liabilities of Corporate   disabling  injury,  disease  or  resignation  can  cause
        Directors'  and  Officers'  today.  The  increase  in   severe losses to the firm. Identifying and analyzing
        litigation  against  directors  reflects  a  change  in  the   this  key-person  exposures  requires  distinguishing
        attitude  of  the  general  public  towards  greater   between persons who are key because they are :
        management accountability and hence the position      I. Employees possessing special talents, and
        of a Director is becoming far more onerous. Actions
        are most likely to be commended in relation to: (i)   II. Owners whose absence would threaten the firm's
        Actual or alleged breach of trust (ii) Breach of duty or   survival.
        warranty  of  authority  (iii)  Neglect  or  Omission  (iv)  The loss of the services of a key-person can result in
        Error  or  misstatement  or  misleading  statement  (v)  major financial problems for a firm. The profits which
        Failure to supervise or regulate properly.            he  had  been  generating  would  be  lost  until  a

        Who might bring an Action? (i) Shareholders: alleging   replacement could be found and trained to produce
        financial loss attributable to failure by Directors or   the same level. Further, the firm would have to incur
        Officers  responsible  (ii)  Employees:  alleging  unfair   extra expenses to find and recruit a replacement and
        dismissal,  discrimination,  sexual  harassment  or   to  reassign  duties  temporarily  among  other
                                                              employees  until  this  replacement  became  fully
        mismanagement  of  pension  funds  (iii)  Customers:
                                                              productive.
        alleging  that  they  have  suffered  financial  loss
        following  wrongful  advice  on  the  application  or   Indeed the loss of a key-person may even threaten the
        suitability of product (iv) Competitors: alleging that   survival of the firm. The heirs or other successors of a
        their businesses have been adversely affected by a    key-person  may  not  be  able  to  contribute  to  the
        restrictive  trade  practice  e.g.:  price  fixing  (v)   success of the business in the same way.
        Members of the Public: failure to effect and maintain  POSSIBLE  WAYS  OF  MEETING  VARIOUS  BUSINESS
        adequate control or services. (vi) Regulatory Bodies:  RISKS :
        for  offences  under  the  Companies  Ordinance  or  Avoiding Loss Exposures :
        breaches in similar legislation.
                                                              The first devise that strikes the mind immediately is to
        Potential  Allegations:  The  following  list  provides  avoid those risks which are avoidable. The essence of
        typical examples of "wrongful acts" which could be  risk avoidance is to refrain from undertaking or to
        alleged against a Director or Officer - though, this is  abandon  an  extra  hazardous  project,  thus,
        not  an exhaustive  list:  (i)  Inaccurate  statements  of  completely  removing  the  possibility  of  loss  arising
        financial conditions (ii) Errors in annual accounts (iii)  from that project. A prudent business person avoids
        Conflict of interest (iv) Lack of judgment, diligence or  activities  which  are  too  hazardous,  such  as
        good  faith  (v)  Mismanagement  of  funds  (vi)  establishment of a store on the banks of a river which
        Misstatements  in  prospectuses  (vii)  Allotment  of  floods regularly, or selling a product which is likely to
        shares  (viii)  Unauthorized  or  imprudent  loans  or  injure customers, or using delivery vans which have
        investments (ix) Failure to obtain competitive bids (x)  known mechanically defects.

        22                                             RISK MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION OF INDIA
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28