Page 281 - Operations Strategy
P. 281

256 CHAPTER 7 • ImPRovEmEnT sTRATEgy

                      Gawande tells the story of Peter Pronovost – a specialist in critical care at Johns Hopkins
                      Hospital – who, in 2001, tried to reduce the number of patients who were becoming infected on
                    account of the use of intravenous central lines. There are five steps that medical teams can take
                    to reduce the chances of contracting such infections. Initially, Pronovost simply asked nurses to
                    observe whether doctors took the five steps. What they found was that at least a third of the time
                    they missed one or more of the steps. So nurses were authorised to stop doctors who had missed
                    out any of the steps and, as a matter of course, ask whether existing intravenous central lines
                    should be reviewed. As a result of applying these simple checklist-style rules, the ten-day line-
                    infection rates went down from 11 per cent to zero. In one hospital it was calculated that, over a
                    year, this simple method had prevented 43 infections, 8 deaths and saved about $2  million. Using
                    the same checklist approach, the hospital identified and applied the method to other activities.
                    For example, a check in which nurses asked patients about their pain levels led to untreated
                    pain reducing from 41 per cent to 3 per cent. Similarly, the simple checklists method helped
                    the average length of patient stay in intensive care to fall by half. When Pronovost’s approach
                    was adopted by other hospitals, within 18 months 1,500 lives and $175 million had been saved.
                      Gawande describes checklists used in this way as a ‘cognitive net’ – a mechanism that can
                    help prevent experienced people from making errors due to flawed memory and attention,
                    and ensure that teams work together. Simple checklists are common in other professions. Civil
                    engineers use them to make certain that complicated structures are assembled on-schedule.
                    Chefs use them to make sure that food is prepared exactly to the customers’ taste. Airlines use
                    them to make sure that pilots take-off safely and also to learn from, now relatively rare, crashes.
                    Indeed, Gawande is happy to acknowledge that checklists are not a new idea. He tells the story
                    of the prototype of the Boeing B17 Flying Fortress that crashed after take-off on its trial flight
                    in 1935. Most experts said that the bomber was ‘too complex to fly’. Facing bankruptcy, Boe-
                    ing investigated and discovered that, confronted with four engines rather than two, the pilot
                    forgot to release a vital locking mechanism. But Boeing created a pilot’s checklist, in which the
                    fundamental actions for the stages of flying were made a mandated part of the pilot’s job. In
                    the following years, B17s flew almost two million miles without a single accident. According to
                    Gawande, even for pilots (many of whom are rugged individualists) it is usually the application
                    of routine procedures that saves planes when things go wrong, rather than the ‘hero-pilotry’ so
                    fêted by the media. It is discipline rather than brilliance that preserves life. In fact, it is discipline
                    that leaves room for brilliance to flourish.




                           Knowledge management
                           Central to the idea of improvement is the importance of learning how to do things
                           better. And central to learning how to do things better is the idea of ‘knowledge’, where
                           knowledge is defined as:

                             ‘facts, information, and skills acquired through experience or education; the theoretical or
                             practical understanding of a subject’.  9
                           Note how the definition stresses the source of knowledge, and distinguishes between
                           two sources – experience (doing things) and education (explaining or describing what
                           experience has taught you for the benefit of other people). Doing something may lead
                           you to know more about it, but having to articulate it or explain it makes your knowl-
                           edge more valuable because it can be shared with others. It is this process of formalis-
                           ing experience that distinguishes between what is often called ‘tacit’ knowledge and
                           ‘explicit’ knowledge.









        M07 Operations Strategy 62492.indd   256                                                      02/03/2017   13:06
   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286