Page 15 - WhoAreWe...

these attributes most likely did not survive. So why are we
now not even more war-like than we are?

It is not hard to imagine that these softer, kinder attributes
were likely carried primarily by the female of the species as
they for the most part possessed less testosterone. It is also
not hard to imagine that when one ostensibly fiercer tribe
annihilated another, they probably stole the loser's shelter,
food, and you guessed it — women!

And what did they do with these women? Well, they most
likely took them into their tribe, and do what came
naturally — procreated with them, which could have had
the effect of genetically bringing some of the less fierce
attributes of these women into the children they bore, and
therefore into the tribe itself and any offspring that would
come down the road.

So who knows, it might be said that male dominance was
part of its own downfall right from the start. It wouldn't be
the first time that an unsustainable human ideology was a
party to its own eventual demise. Without the women of the
world, it sometimes seems that chances are that we surely
would have killed ourselves off long ago.

So if you want to be a male person of higher standard, then
I'd suggest you get to work on your personal integrity and
make sure the content of your character is sound because in
this life, you simply don't get to be naturally superior by
lines of race, creed, or gender.

And goodness gracious, if you need any more evidence
then just consider the nightmare scenarios of male
dominant-oriented cultures that throw away female babies,
use centrifuges to ensure male birth, perform forced female
circumcisions, deny females the right to be educated, vote,

12