Page 90 - All files for Planning Inspectorate update
P. 90

The seven folios do not include any narrative or recommendations on the number of
                   affordable dwellings (if any) that Dixon Searle would support. Their only benefit was (a) to
                   tick a planning box to mislead that the conditions of paragraph 2 above had been satisfied,

                   (b) that Mrs Blomfield         notice could be processed and the application rushed
                   through and (c) members of the public would be kept in the dark on whether or not any
                   affordable housing was recommended. It is possibly yet another example of the deliberate
                   ambiguity that has been a thread running through the WH  applications.

                   4. LAND VALUES, SURPLUSES AND DEFICITS
                   In simple terms, a       is created when the residual land value (RLV) of a development
                                                                             ) exceeds the existing use
                   value (EUV) or alternative use value (AUV). In most cases a project is considered viable if it

                   creates a surplus  subject to risk weighting - and unviable if it does not. The purchase price of
                   land is distinct from both the EUV and RLV and is almost irrelevant.

                   An excellent paper by Herbert Smith Freehills, for the City of London states:









                                                                                            3
                   The applicant has valued (EUV) the WH:EDF site based on predicted rental income as an
                   active office building when it is far from that. It is a      elephant  and a relic of the Cold
                   War. It has remained unoccupied for around 18 months and is probably of little of no interest
                   to potential renters or buyers. It is, in fact, an unexceptional brownfield site of 0.64 hectares.
                   The Department for Communities and Local Government  publication      value estimates
                   for policy appraisal  suggest an average value (nationally) of brownfield sites of  482,000
                   per hectare. At 0.64 hectares this would mean a that a BLV-EUV (without planning
                   permission) for the WH:EDF site would be between  300,000 to  500,000: not  2,900,000.

                   Such a valuation would make a massive difference to viability and the ability to support
                   affordable homes. Of course, planning permission depends on OAN and the Development

                   Plan. These limit the number of dwellings on the site to 22 to 23 units to remain  as required
                   - in character with the village and scaling of adjacent properties.
                   5. OWNERSHIP OF THE WH:EDF SITE
                   The status and ownership of the WH:EDF site is confused;
                                                                                         st
                          It was          purchased (presumably by AHL) for  2,900,000 on 1 March 2018
                                                                                       th
                          and valued at the same amount on the      recent valuation  on 27 November
                          2018;
                          However, the most recent known valuation (of  2,935,000) was by Martin
                                                                      st
                          Campbell, Commercial Property Consultant on 21 December 2018.
                          There is no record of the March 2018 transaction on the Land Registry.
                               th
                          On 29 September 2017, the Land Registry records an agreement by AHL to purchase
                          the WH:EDF site:




                   3                                                  .
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95