Page 91 - All files for Planning Inspectorate update
P. 91

On 29 May 2018 Mr Peter Owen, the MD of AHL stated that it had an option to purchase,
                         th
                   the site subject to planning permission. He continued that GCP Developments Ltd, was not a
                   partner in the proposed development but was sellers of it.

                   6. THE DIXON SEARLE NARRATIVE
                   Out of the blue, late in the evening of 8 July 2019
                                                      th
                          entries on the MSDC Planning Portal increased from 129 to 131 lines:





                                              The Viability report was added



























                   The        Searle Viability Review  hyperlinks to 17-page, narrative plus copies of some of
                                                                a
                   the ACHL spread sheets referred to earlier. Why the narrative had become separated from
                   the seven trial appraisals - on which it relies - is mystery.

                   But based on MSDC  past performance, and its fixation on bludgeoning through the WH
                   applications, it possible that the withholding of the Viability Report was not entirely
                   accidental and was only included after second thoughts by someone with common sense.

                   The Dixon Searle narrative is not a conventional viability appraisal, but more an      of
                   AHCL  figures and acceptance of many of its assumptions: including some with which is
                   appears not to agree. To that extent the review may fail the test of independence.

                   I am not qualified to express a professional opinion on the narrative
                                                   It is, however, apparent that;

                          The limited scope of the review was determined by MSDC in a briefing that has not
                          been produced;
                          It relies on information provided by MSDC without specifying what that was;
                          It makes no reference to the WH:LIC scheme which is a material consideration on
                          which the viability of DM/19/1025 depends;
                          Parts of the review were cut and pasted from earlier work for North Hertfordshire
                          District Council and Rochford District Council
                                   );
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96