Page 290 - All files for Planning Inspectorate
P. 290

Statement of Case
                                              EDF Energy, Wealden House, Lewes Road, Ashurst Wood



                      First Issue – Affordable Housing



               6.9    Policy DP31 of the Mid Sussex District Plan requires 30% affordable to be provided
                      on site on all residential development schemes providing 11 dwellings or more.   The

                      policy also states that proposals that do not meet these requirements will be refused

                      unless  significant  clear  evidence  demonstrates  to  the  Council’s  satisfaction  that  the
                      site cannot support the required affordable housing from a viability and deliverability

                      prospective.   Viability should be set out in an independent viability assessment on
                      terms  agreed  by  the  relevant  parties,  including  the  Council  and  funded  by  the

                      developer.   This will involve an open book approach.


               6.10  The application was accompanied by a Viability Assessment prepared independently

                      by  Melanie  Dwyer  MRICS  of  Affordable  Housing  Consultancy  Ltd.      The  report
                      concluded the development of the site with 54 apartments would result in a negative

                      land  value  based  upon  the  existing  site  value  with  a  policy  compliant  level  of
                      contributions.      The  development  would  also  have    negative  value  based  upon  nil

                      contributions.


               6.11  The results demonstrated that the scheme was not viable with any affordable housing

                      but  also  indicated  that,  despite  the  marginal  viability,  the  applicant  would  still  be
                      prepared to make the necessary S106 infrastructure contributions.



               6.12  The  Viability  Appraisal  was  assessed  on  behalf  of  Mid  Sussex  District  Council  by
                      Dixon Searle.  Despite there being a broad measure of agreement in relation to values,

                      costs  and  revenue,  Dixon  Searle  disputed  the  20%  profit  margin  in  the  appellant’s
                      appraisal  as  well  as  certain  other  factors  which  led  them  to  conclude  that  up  to  9

                      affordable housing units could viably be provided on the site.




               ___________________________________________________________________________

               10 December, 2019                                                                    Page 20

                                                     Bates No  000289
   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295