Page 408 - Ranah Studi Agraria: Penguasaan Tanah dan Hubungan Agraris
P. 408

Agrarian and Nonagrarian Bases ...

               available to finance further concentration of landed property
               are increasing. On the one hand wealthy households have many
               other avenues for profitable investment’ and many demands
               for nonproductive expenditure, which compete with the al-

               ternative of land acquisition. On the other hand, the many
               smaller owners whose agricultural incomes do not provide
               reproduction at minimal levels (cf. Table 7.11) are able by
               participating in a variety of low-return nonfarm activities both
               inside and outside the village to achieve subsistence incomes
               without the distress sale of their sublivelihood’ plots. These
               patterns, which are certainly not unique to Java, call for inter-
               pretations of agrarian differentiation processes under condi-
               tions of commoditization and productivity growth which place
               the phenomenon of ‘part-time’ farming and farm labor at all
               levels of the agrarian structure in more central focus.


               H. Notes

                   I)  Limitations of space prevent us from discussing these
               problems in comparability, which are described in detail in a
               longer version of this paper “Agrarian Changes in Nine Java-
               nese Villages. 1971-1981,” available from the authors The base-
               line data for ‘1971’ were obtained from two sources. The first
               comprised sample surveys of thirty farm households in each
               village from Round 5 of the Agro Economic Survey’s ‘Rice
               Intensification Study,’ covering wet season 1970- 1971 and
               dry season 1971. These samples are somewhat upwardly bi-
               ased with respect to farm size due to the purposive inclusion
               of five ‘large farmers’ in the sample. The second source com-
               prised a partial agricultural census conducted at the end of

                                                                   339
   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413