Page 405 - Ranah Studi Agraria: Penguasaan Tanah dan Hubungan Agraris
P. 405

Ranah Studi Agraria

            with ‘smallholder cultivation’ (by the landowners), has in prac-
            tice resulted in a new form of rent; land assigned to sugarcane
            is made over to landowner groups whose leaders organize its
            cultivation using wage labor, and the net income from sales is

            divided among the landowners who may have had no direct
            role in its cultivation. Only in three villages are large amounts
            of income derived from rural small industries employing wage
            labor: brick and rooftile enterprises in Sentul, kerupuk manu-
            facture in Janti, and commercial rice mills in Rowosari, with a
            smaller contribution from blacksmithing industries in Geneng
            which produce small agricultural tools, knives, and vehicle
            springs. Trade figures prominently only in Jatisari (mainly
            vegetables and paddy) and Rowosari (paddy and fish); paddy
            traders in these villages in 1981 specialized in low-price pur-
            chasing from farmers unable to reach the minimum moisture
            content stipulated for guaranteed-price purchase by the co-
            operatives, to be resold to the cooperatives without further
            processing through close relations with cooperative officials
            willing to ignore the regulations.
                In Kebanggan, Wanarata, and Janti many members of the
            large landowning households have secure salaried positions
            as school teachers. In Wanarata, a large proportion of their

            nonfarm incomes derive from the hire of vehicles. We should
            also mention—although the limitations of questionnaire in-
            terviews mean that it does not figure in our quantitative data
            on incomes—that many large landowners also derive income
            from usury, a major source of loans for the large proportions
            of households in all villages (especially in the small-farm and
            landless groups) who reported informal-sector debts; about

            336
   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410