Page 205 - GQ 12
P. 205

26* Bruno Chiesa and Miriam Goldstein

     generally scant attestation of the Kuzarī in later sources.33 In at least one
     case Yefet’s text offers a text better than any other Arabic testimonies, in
     the additional description regarding the Sadducees and Boethusians that
     ‘they are but dissenters who behave as unbelievers and deny the afterlife’.34

          Yefet concludes his lengthy introduction with a reconstruction of the
     history of Karaism, in which he presents a historiography that differs from
     what is presented by al-Qirqisānī in the first book of Kitāb al-anwār. The
     chain of tradition and the Jewish maḏhab were single and unified until the
     time of Hillel and Shammai: ‘Each individual was writing down, according
     to his ability, parts of the explanation of the Torah and of its laws that he had
     heard from his teachers’.35 Dissent arose at the time of Hillel and Shammai
     due to the fact that some transmitters of tradition turned to the ‘heavenly
     voice’ (bat qol) in order to provide support for their claims.36 Following
     that time, the tradition split: The Karaites adopted the point of view of the
     school of Shammai, which was a unified and uncontested view, while the
     adherents of the Mishnah (benei mishnah) took the path of Hillel’s school
     with its deep internal contradictions and differences of opinion.

          The first five chapters of Yefet ibn Saghir’s Book of Commandments
     establish a succinct quasi-historical and utterly polemical narrative
     regarding Karaite Judaism, its origins and its relationship to its Rabbanite
     rivals as well as to neighboring religions. Yefet’s narrative diverges from
     that of earlier Karaite sources, and further examination of the composition
     as a whole and its author’s positions on theology and law will reveal the
     extent to which fourteenth-century Karaites were establishing a new path
     for their movement in the Arabic-speaking world.

              Z. Ankori to the 1966 Karaite reprint of Bashyatzi’s Aderet Eliyahu (Ramle:
              ‘Adat ha-Yehudim ha-Qara’im be-Yisrael, 1966), 12.
      33 Yefet’s work adds to the short list noted in D.H. Baneth and H. Ben-
              Shammai, Kitāb al-radd wa-’l-dalīl f ī ̇’l-dīn al-dhalīl by Judah ha-Levi
              (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1977), viii–ix/ ‫יא‬-‫י‬.
      34 ‫פלם יכונו אלא ̇כוארג מתזנדקון מנכרון ללא ̇כר ̈ה‬
      35 Yefet repeats the same passage from Maimonides’ Introduction to the
              Mishneh Torah that he cited above.
      36 See bEruvin 13b; cf. S. Cook, On the Question of “The Cessation of
              Prophecy” in Ancient Judaism (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011), 159–164.
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210