Page 187 - PWK

bandhamokñavyavasthärthamätmanänätvamiñyatäm |
iti cenna yato mäyä vyavasthäpayituà kñamä || 233||
bNx-mae]-VyvSwawRm! = to establish bondage and liberation; AaTm-nanaTvm! = plurality of Self; #:ytam!

= must be accepted; #it cet! = if so; n = no; yt> = because; maya = Maya; VyvSwapiytum! = for

establishing; ]ma = adequate.

233. (Doubt): To establish the bondage and liberation of an individual (Jiva), the plurality of Self

must be accepted. (Reply): No, that is not necessary because Maya is adequate for establishing

bondage and liberation.

Ê"Rq< "qyamIit ivéÏ< ikÚ pZyis,

vaStvaE bNxmae]aE tu ïuitnR shtetram!. 234.

durghaöaà ghaöayäméti viruddhaà kinna paçyasi |
västavau bandhamokñau tu çrutirna sahatetaräm || 234||
Ê"Rqm! = impossible; "qyaim = make (possible); #it = thus; ivéÏm! = contradiction; ik< n pZyis =

don't you see; vaStvaE = real; bNx-mae]aE = bondage and liberation; tu = indeed; ïuit> = Shruti; n

shtetram! = does not support.

234. Do you not see the contradiction that Maya can make the impossible appear as possible? In

fact, Shruti does not support either bondage or liberation as real.

n inraexae n caeTpiÄ> n bÏae n c saxk>,

n mumu]unR vE mu´ #Tye;a prmawRta. 235.

na nirodho na cotpattiù na baddho na ca sädhakaù |
na mumukñurna vai mukta ityeñä paramärthatä || 235||
n inraex> = no destruction; n c %TpiÄ> = and no creation; n bÏ> = no bondage; n c saxk> = and

no seeker; n mumu]u> = no aspirant of liberation; n vE mu´> = and not even liberated; #it = thus; @;a

= this; prmawRta = supreme Truth.

Sandeepany Sadhanalaya 94