Page 592 - Microeconomics, Fourth Edition
P. 592

c13marketstructureandcompetition.qxd  7/30/10  10:44 AM  Page 566







                  566                   CHAPTER 13   MARKET STRUCTURE AND COMPETITION
                  b) Suppose Firms 1 and 2 merge, but their marginal cost  v) All of the above are possible.
                  remains at 5. What are the new Cournot equilibrium quan-  b) Suppose that it is observed that from one month to
                  tities and price? Is the profit of the merged firm bigger or  the next, Firm 1’s quantity goes down, Firm 2’s quantity
                  smaller than the combined profits of Firms 1 and 2 in the  goes down, and the market price goes down. A change in
                  initial equilibrium in part (a)? Provide an explanation for  the demand and/or cost conditions consistent with what
                  the effect of the merger on profit in this market.  we observe is:

                  13.11.  An industry is known to face market price elas-  i) The market demand curve shifted leftward in a paral-
                  ticity of demand    Q, P   3.  (Assume this elasticity as  lel fashion.
                  constant as the industry moves along its demand curve.)  ii) The market demand curve shifted rightward in a par-
                  The marginal cost of each firm in this industry is $10 per  allel fashion.
                  unit, and there are five firms in the industry. What would  iii) Firm 1’s marginal cost went up, while Firm 2’s mar-
                  the Lerner Index be at the Cournot equilibrium in this  ginal cost stayed the same.
                  industry?                                        iv) Firm 2’s marginal cost went down, while Firm 1’s
                  13.12.  Besanko, Inc., is one of two Cournot dupolists in  marginal cost stayed the same.
                  the market for gizmos. It and its main competitor  v) All of the above are possible.
                  Schmedders Ltd. face a downward-sloping market   c) Suppose that it is observed that from one month to
                  demand curve. Each firm has an identical marginal cost  the next, Firm 1’s quantity goes up, Firm 2’s quantity
                  that is independent of output. Please indicate how the fol-  goes up, and the market price goes up. A change in the
                  lowing will affect Besanko’s and Schmedders’s reaction  demand and/or cost conditions consistent with what we
                  functions, and the Cournot equilibrium quantities pro-  observe is:
                  duced by Besanko and Schmedders.
                                                                   i) The market demand curve shifted leftward in a paral-
                  a) Leading safety experts begin to recommend that all  lel fashion.
                  home owners should replace their smoke detectors with  ii) The market demand curve shifted rightward in a par-
                  gizmos.
                                                                   allel fashion.
                  b) Besanko and Schmedders’s gizmos are made out of  iii) Both firms’ marginal costs went up by the same
                  platinum, with each gizmo requiring 1 kg of platinum.  amount.
                  The price of platinum goes up.
                  c) Besanko, Inc.’s total fixed cost increases.   iv) Both firms’ marginal costs went down by the same
                                                                   amount.
                  d) The government imposes an excise tax on gizmos  v) All of the above are possible.
                  produced by Schmedders, but not on those produced by
                  Besanko.                                         d) Suppose that it is observed that from one month to the
                                                                   next, Firm 1’s quantity goes up, Firm 2’s quantity goes
                  13.13.  Suppose that firms in a two-firm industry choose  up, and the market price goes down. A change in the
                  quantities every month, and each month the firms sell at  demand and/or cost conditions consistent with what we
                  the market-clearing price determined by the quantities  observe is:
                  they choose. Each firm has a constant marginal cost, and  i) The market demand curve shifted leftward in a paral-
                  the market demand curve is linear of the form P   a    lel fashion.
                  bQ, where Q is total industry quantity and P is the market
                  price. Suppose that initially each firm has the same con-  ii) The market demand curve shifted rightward in a par-
                  stant marginal cost. Further suppose that each month the  allel fashion.
                  firms attain the Cournot equilibrium in quantities.  iii) Both firms’ marginal costs went up by the same
                                                                   amount.
                  a) Suppose that it is observed that from one month to the
                  next Firm 1’s quantity goes down, Firm 2’s quantity goes  iv) Both firms’ marginal costs went down by the same
                  up, and the market price goes up. A change in the demand  amount.
                  and/or cost conditions consistent with what we observe is:  v) All of the above are possible.
                  i) The market demand curve shifted leftward in a parallel  13.14.  An industry consists of two Cournot firms selling
                  fashion.                                         a homogeneous product with a market demand curve
                  ii) The market demand curve shifted rightward in a paral-  given by P   100   Q 1   Q 2 . Each firm has a marginal
                  lel fashion.                                     cost of $10 per unit.
                  iii) Firm 1’s marginal cost went up, while Firm 2’s mar-  a) Find the Cournot equilibrium quantities and price.
                  ginal cost stayed the same.                      b) Find the quantities and price that would prevail if the
                  iv) Firm 2’s marginal cost went up, while Firm 1’s mar-  firms acted “as if” they were a monopolist (i.e., find the
                  ginal cost stayed the same.                      collusive outcome).
   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597