Page 605 - Microeconomics, Fourth Edition
P. 605

c14gametheoryandstrategicbehavior.qxd  8/6/10  11:57 AM  Page 579







                                                       14.1 THE CONCEPT OF NASH EQUILIBRIUM                     579
                      TABLE 14.6a   Price Competition between Coke and Pepsi after Identifying
                      Pepsi’s Dominant Strategy and Dominated Strategies*
                                                             Coke
                                                 $10.50  $11.50  $12.50  $13.50
                                           $6.25   66, 190  68, 199  70, 198  73, 191
                                           $7.25   79, 201  82, 211  85, 214  89, 208
                                     Pepsi
                                           $8.25   82, 212  86, 224  90, 229  95, 225
                                           $9.25   75, 223  80, 237  85, 244  91, 245

                      *Payoffs are in millions of dollars.




                      GAMES WITH MORE THAN ONE NASH EQUILIBRIUM
                      All of the games we have just studied had a unique Nash equilibrium. But some games
                      have more than one Nash equilibrium. A famous example is the game of Chicken:
                      Two teenage boys are going to prove their manhood to their friends. They each get
                      in their cars at opposite ends of a road and begin to drive toward each other at break-
                      neck speed. If one car swerves before the other, the one that did not swerve (i.e., stays)
                      proves his manhood and becomes a hero to his friends, while the other loses face (he
                      is a “chicken”). If both swerve, nothing gets proven: Neither loses face, but neither
                      gains status either. If neither swerves, though, they crash into each other and are
                      either injured or killed.
                         Table 14.7 shows the payoffs for the game of Chicken between two teenagers,
                      Luke and Slick. There are two Nash equilibria in this game. The first is for Luke to
                      swerve and for Slick to stay. The other is for Luke to stay and Slick to swerve. To verify
                      that the first is a Nash equilibrium, note that if Luke swerves, Slick is better off staying
                      (payoff of 10) than swerving (payoff of 0). And if Luke stays, Slick is better off swerving
                      (payoff of  10), than staying (payoff of  100).
                         Do Chicken games occur in real life? In the 1950s and 1960s, many felt that a
                      Chicken game was a good description of how a nuclear showdown between the United
                      States and the Soviet Union would play out. The famous quote by John F. Kennedy’s
                      secretary of state, Dean Rusk, following the Cuban Missile Crisis, “We’re eyeball to
                      eyeball and the other fellow just blinked,” is an illustration of how one high-stakes
                      game of Chicken during the Cold War played out. Less dramatically, but perhaps
                      more pervasively, games of Chicken arise in economics when two firms compete in a
                      market that can profitably support only one firm. (In Chapter 11, we called these nat-
                      ural monopoly markets.) The Nash equilibrium in the Chicken game tells us that one
                      firm will eventually exit the market and one firm will survive.



                      TABLE 14.7   The Game of Chicken
                                                             Slick
                                                        Swerve     Stay
                                               Swerve    0, 0      10, 10
                                         Luke
                                               Stay     10,   10   100,   100
   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610