Page 663 - Economics
P. 663

CONFIRMING PAGES





                  PART EIGHT
              572
                  Microeconomics of Government
                    •   A tax is   progressive   if its average rate increases as in-  has an income of $15,000 and spends it all. “High-income”
                     come increases. Such a tax claims not only a larger   Jones has an income of $300,000 but spends only $200,000
                     absolute (dollar) amount but also a larger percentage   and saves the rest. Assuming a 5 percent sales tax applies
                     of income as income increases.                  to all expenditures of each individual, we find that Smith
                    •   A tax is   regressive   if its average rate declines as in-  pays $750 (5 percent of $15,000) in sales taxes and Jones
                     come increases. Such a tax takes a smaller proportion   pays $10,000 (5 percent of $200,000). But Smith pays
                     of income as income increases. A regressive tax may   $750 $15,000, or 5 percent of income, as sales taxes, while
                     or may not take a larger absolute amount of income   Jones pays $10,000 $300,000, or 3.3 percent of income.
                     as income increases. (You may want to derive an ex-  The general sales tax therefore is regressive.
                     ample to substantiate this conclusion.)
                    •   A tax is   proportional   if its average rate  remains the     Corporate Income Tax     The Federal corporate income
                     same  regardless of the size of income.         tax is essentially a proportional tax with a flat 35 percent
                      We can illustrate these ideas with the personal income   tax rate. But this assumes that corporation owners (share-
                 tax. Suppose tax rates are such that a household pays   holders) bear the tax. Some tax experts argue that at least
                 10 percent of its income in taxes regardless of the size of   part of the tax is passed through to consumers in the form
                 its income. This is a  proportional  income tax. Now suppose   of higher product prices. To the extent that this occurs, the
                 the rate structure is such that a household with an annual   tax is like a sales tax and is thus regressive.
                 taxable income of less than $10,000 pays 5 percent in
                 income taxes; a household with an income of $10,000 to     Payroll Taxes     Taxes levied on payrolls (Social Security
                 $20,000 pays 10 percent; one with a $20,000 to $30,000   and Medicare) are regressive because the Social Security
                 income pays 15 percent; and so forth. This is a  progressive    tax applies to only a fixed amount of income. For exam-
                 income tax. Finally, suppose the rate declines as taxable in-  ple, in 2006 the Social Security tax rate was 6.2 percent,
                 come rises: You pay 15 percent if you earn less than   but only of the first $94,200 of a person’s wage income.
                 $10,000; 10 percent if you earn $10,000 to $20,000; 5 per-  The Medicare tax was 1.45 percent of all wage income.
                 cent if you earn $20,000 to $30,000; and so forth. This is a   Someone earning exactly $94,200 would pay $7206, or
                   regressive  income tax.                           7.65 percent (  6.2 percent   1.45 percent) of his or her
                      In general, progressive taxes are those that fall rela-  income. Someone with twice that wage income,
                 tively more heavily on people with high incomes; regres-  or $188,400, would pay $8572 (  $7206 on the first
                 sive taxes are those that fall relatively more heavily on the   $94,200   $1366 on the second $94,200), which is only
                 poor.  (Key Question 7)                             4.55 percent of his or her wage income. So the average
                                                                     payroll tax falls as income rises, confirming that the pay-
                   Applications     Let’s examine the progressivity, or re-  roll tax is regressive.
                 gressivity, of several taxes.                            Moreover, government does not collect payroll taxes
                                                                     on nonwage income (such as interest, dividends, or rents).
                   Personal Income Tax     We noted in Chapter 4 that the   High-income persons tend to derive a higher percentage
                 Federal personal income tax is progressive, with marginal   of total income from nonwage sources than do people who
                 tax rates (those assessed on additional income) ranging   have incomes below the $94,200 maximum on which social
                 from 10 to 35 percent in 2006. Rules that allow individuals   security taxes are paid.  This makes payroll taxes even
                 to deduct from income interest on home mortgages and   more regressive. If our individual with the $188,400 of
                 property taxes and that exempt interest on state and local   wage income also received $188,400 of nonwage income,
                 bonds from taxation tend to make the tax less progressive   the $8572 of payroll tax would be only 2.23 percent of his
                 than these marginal rates suggest. Nevertheless, average   or her total income.
                 tax rates rise with income.
                                                                       Property Taxes     Most economists conclude that prop-
                   Sales Taxes     At first thought, a general sales tax with, for   erty taxes on buildings are regressive for the same reasons
                 example, a 5 percent rate would seem to be proportional.   as are sales taxes. First, property owners add the tax to the
                 But in fact it is regressive with respect to income. A larger   rents that tenants are charged. Second, property taxes, as a
                 portion of a low-income person’s income is exposed to the   percentage of income, are higher for low-income families
                 tax than is the case for a high-income person; the rich pay   than for high-income families because the poor must
                 no tax on the part of income that is saved, whereas the   spend a larger proportion of their incomes for housing.
                 poor are unable to save. Example: “Low-income” Smith   This alleged regressivity of property taxes may be increased








                                                                                                                       9/10/06   9:41:04 PM
          mcc26632_ch29_564-580.indd   572                                                                             9/10/06   9:41:04 PM
          mcc26632_ch29_564-580.indd   572
   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668