Page 484 - Fiber Optic Communications Fund
P. 484

Nonlinear Effects in Fibers                                                        465


            Next consider the correlation between linear and degenerate IFWM,
                                               ∑       ∑
                           <I I IFWM,d  > =          Re[u ]u lin,n ′ < b b ′ >
                              lin
                                                                           n n
                                                                lln
                                            l+m−n=0,l=m n ′ ,n ′ ≠0
                                                                       (      )
                                                                           2 2
                                            √        ∑                   −n T s
                                         =   P 0          Re[u ] exp   2    .         (10.298)
                                                                 lln
                                                l+m−n=0,l=m,n≠0           T 0
            The variance of I IFWM,nd  is
                                                    ∑       ∑
                                     2
                                                2
                                 <I      > = 4                 Re[u  ]
                                    IFWM,nd                             lmn
                                                             ′
                                                          ′
                                                               ′
                                                  l+m−n=0  l +m −n =0
                                                                ′
                                                         ′
                                                            ′ ′
                                                  l<m,l≠m≠n l <m ,l ≠m ≠n ′
                                              Re[u ′ m ′ n ′] < b b b b ′b ′b ′ >.      (10.299)
                                                   l       l m n l  m  n
           Since < b b b b ′b ′b ′ >=  ′ mm ′ nn ′, Eq. (10.299) is simplified as
                  l m n l  m  n    ll
                                                       ∑                 2
                                                2
                                     2
                                 <I      >= 4              (Re{u  }) .              (10.300)
                                     IFWM,nd                         lmn
                                                  l+m−n=0,l<m,l≠m≠n
           Using Eqs. (10.289) and (10.290) in Eq. (10.287), it is easy to show that
                                                 <I >= 0,                               (10.301)
                              2
                      2  = <I >=<I 2  > + <I 2  > + <I 2  > +2 <I I    >
                      PSK             lin       IFWM,d       IFWM,nd        lin  IFWM,d
                           +2 <I I IFWM,nd  > +2 <I IFWM,nd I IFWM,d  >.          (10.302)
                                 lin
           It can be shown that the correlation between degenerate IFWM and non-degenerate IFWM is zero and that
           between linear ISI and non-degenerate IFWM is also zero. Hence, Eq. (10.302) becomes
                          2  =<I 2  > + <I 2  > + <I 2  > +2 <I I   >.        (10.303)
                          PSK     lin      IFWM,d        IFWM,nd       lin  IFWM,d
            Next, let us consider a direct detection OOK system. The photocurrent is
                                                             2
                                             I ∝ P = |u(T, L )| .                         (10.304)
                                                          tot
           Setting the constant of proportionality to be unity and using Eq. (10.283),
                                                              2
                                    0       tot    1       tot
                         I(T = 0)= |u (T = 0, L )+ u (T = 0, L )|
                                                                                 2
                                                                       2
                                           2
                                                            ∗
                                = |u (0, L )| + 2Re{u (0, L )u (0, L )} +  |u (0, L )| .  (10.305)
                                    0   tot         0    tot  1  tot      1   tot
           In Eq. (10.305), the first, second, and last terms on the right-hand side represent the currents due to the lin-
           ear transmission, signal–nonlinear distortion beating, and nonlinear distortion–nonlinear distortion beating.
           When the nonlinear distortion is small, the last term can be ignored. Eq. (10.305) can be written as
                                              I = I + I  + I ,                        (10.306)
                                                  0   lin   nl
           where
                                                  I = P ,                                 (10.307)
                                                        0
                                                   0
   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489