Page 115 - Introduction to Business
P. 115

CHAPTER 2    The Environment of Business  89


                 common defense and foreign policy institutions. The  international that follow are ordered from less to more
                 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a   business risk that they entail. First, export-import busi-
                 comprehensive trade agreement that deals with issues  ness is a relatively low-risk operation given the fact that
                 ranging from the phased reduction (and finally     capital is not tied up and it is relatively easy to enter
                 elimination) of trade barriers to the protection of  into or exit out of this business. Furthermore, there are
                 workers’ rights and the environment among Canada,  well-established techniques of trade finance that are
                 the United States, and Mexico. While the structure of  aimed at facilitating trade on the one hand and mini-
                 NAFTA is relatively complex, its institutions are not as  mizing financial risk on the other. Second, in licensing
                 far reaching as those of the European Union. With an  and franchising, the relationship with the overseas
                 initial interest in addressing regional security issues, the  partner is closer. The company that is providing the
                 Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) has  license or franchise will need to properly evaluate,
                 moved steadily toward greater economic cooperation  understand, and trust the overseas partner, since such
                 with a goal of establishing a free trade area by 2007.  relationships last for several years. Licensing and fran-
                 ASEAN’s current membership stands at ten. To prevent  chising involve slightly more risk than international
                 loss of jobs (and loss of exports to China) and also to tap  trade. In licensing, a company or individual provides
                 China’s growing domestic consumer market, members  the foreign partner the technology to manufacture and
                 of ASEAN are hoping to develop a free trade agreement  sell its products in return for an annual license fee.
                 with China by 2010. Regional integration in Latin  Franchising, on the other hand, obligates the parent
                 America has seen a patchwork of constantly changing  firm to provide specialized sales and service support,
                 regional trade and investment agreements. This is a  and sometimes even some seed money, to the foreign
                 result of unrealistic integration goals, political paralysis,  franchisee in return for an annual fee. As in the case of
                 and poor economic policies that have undermined the  licensing, franchising essentially leads to the penetra-
                 implementation of most trade agreements, forcing   tion of international markets without significant capital
                 participating countries to regularly change their  investment abroad. Third, an international joint ven-
                 alliances, objectives, and approaches. The first step  ture is a business that is jointly owned (implies shared
                 toward free trade in Latin America was taken with the  equity) and operated by two or more firms (usually one
                 signing of the Treaty of Montevideo in 1960, creating the  from the host country) that pool their resources to pen-
                 Latin American Free Trade Association (LAFTA). In  etrate foreign markets, generate (and share) profits, and
                 1969, frustrated by the lack of progress in LAFTA,  share the commercial risk. Fourth, strategic alliances
                 Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru joined in  differ from joint ventures in one major characteristic:
                 creating the Andean Group, which aimed at economic  they involve nonequity arrangements. Strategic
                 integration through reduced taxes, a common external  alliances do not involve the creation of a separate entity
                 tariff, and investment in the poorer industrial areas of  with joint ownership. They are a marriage of conven-
                 their countries. The Treaty of Asuncion in 1991 among  ience between two or more firms that stand to gain
                 Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay created the  through cooperation with each other for specific rea-
                 Southern Cone Common Market, or Mercosur (Mercado  sons and for a given period of time. Finally, multina-
                 Comun del Sur). That treaty called for progressive tariff  tional enterprises (MNEs) play a dominant role in this
                 reduction, the adoption of sectoral agreements, a  last, relatively high-risk (with corresponding high
                 common external tariff, and the creation of a common  reward) area. Multinational enterprises are firms that
                 market by 2005. With the apparent success of NAFTA,  have a home base in one country, but own and control
                 formal discussions to establish a Free Trade Area of the  plants (factories) or other businesses overseas.
                 Americas (FTAA), an idea initiated by a 34-nation (all
                 countries of Latin America excluding Cuba) Summit of    LEARNING OBJECTIVE 10
                 the Americas in 1994, begun during the Clinton          Explain the major strategic reasons why multina-
                 administration. The United States hopes to meet the     tional enterprises go abroad.
                 2005 deadline for the FTAA agreement that would
                                                                    There are several reasons why MNEs go international,
                 encompass 800 million people and a $13 trillion
                                                                    all of which are based on the urge to earn higher profits
                 regional economy.
                                                                    by utilizing the MNE’s competitive advantage. Some of
                                                                    the major reasons why MNEs invest abroad include
                     LEARNING OBJECTIVE 9
                                                                    acquiring essential raw materials, maximizing produc-
                     Define and summarize the various methods of con-  tion efficiency, expanding market share, minimizing
                     ducting business internationally.
                                                                    compliance cost, and pursuing a politically safe busi-
                 There are several ways that businesses could partici-  ness environment. Two major avenues by which MNEs
                 pate in and profit from international operations and  enter overseas markets are mergers and acquisitions of
                 much will depend on the amount of risk that entrepre-  existing operations, and the establishment of new sub-
                 neurs are willing to take. The approaches to going  sidiaries.


                 Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning, Inc. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part.
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120