Page 15 - Microsoft Word - NEW 2017 Standard Program.docx
P. 15

APPLICABLE FEDERAL LAW

                  In  this  section,  we  will  provide  information  on  the  various  federal  laws  that  impact  the
                  self-help repossession process. It is imperative to the success of the Recovery Agency owner
                  and the Recovery Agent that they be knowledgeable of these laws in  order to manage the
                  risks associated with the self-help repossession process, ensure the public safety, and avoid
                  costly federal litigation that could devastate a business.

                  Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)

                  The FDCPA and the Self-Help Repossession Process
                  The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) was signed into law in July, 1977, and was
                  created primarily to regulate the activities of third-party debt collectors.  However, Wrongful
                  Repossession lawsuits being filed in federal courts under the FDCPA have greatly escalated
                  in the past few years.  One of the primary reasons for filing these lawsuits in federal courts
                  is that monetary awards in federal lawsuits can be double the amounts awarded in state Courts
                  so more and more lawyers are opting to bring Wrongful Repossession litigation to the federal
                  level.

                  Lawsuits on the federal level alleging Wrongful Repossession are usually filed under Section
                  1692 f (6) (a) of the FDCPA.  Federal court rulings within the past few years involving
                  Wrongful  Repossession  lawsuits  have  made  the  FDCPA  more  relevant  to  the  self-help
                  repossession  process  so  understanding  this  federal  law  and  how  it  impacts  self-help
                  repossession activity is one of the primary compliance mandates for recovery agents.

                  The FDCPA is regulated and defined by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  Since this
                  Act was created primarily for third-party debt collectors many in the collateral recovery
                  industry may think that they are not subject to this federal law because they are not defined
                  as third-party debt collectors.

                  Following is the FTC’s definition of a third-party debt collector: “Any person who uses any
                  instrumentality of interstate commerce or the mails, the Principal Purpose of which is
                  the collection of any debts, or who Regularly Collects, or Attempts to Collect, directly
                  or indirectly, debts owed or due or asserted to be owed or due to another.”  According
                  to this definition, an employee of the company that is owed the debt and is attempting to
                  collect  the  debt  is  not  considered  a  third-party  debt  collector  since  he/she  would  be
                  attempting to collect the debt for their employer.

                  Regarding  repossession  services,  according  to  the  FTC,  those  who  service  repossession
                  assignments  are  defined  as  Security  Enforcers  and  therefore  are  “subject  to  only  the
                  requirements of Section 1692 f (6) (a) (b) (c).”  Violations of this Section reads as follows:

                  “Taking or threatening to take any non-judicial (self-help) action to effect dispossession or
                  disablement of property if:



                  	                                             1
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20