Page 27 - EN-Youth Report
P. 27

Questionnaires

               Quantitative survey questionnaire included 12-questions. This tool was designed to develop a better
               contextual understanding of the issues unique to young people after more than seven years of
               armed conflict. Understanding some of the basic factors and associated grievances is critical for
               developing a systemic cause analysis – those underlying root causes that enable drivers to persist
               and  which  may  lead  young  people  to  actively  or  passively  support  and  engage  with  their
               communities. At the same time, recognizing the fact that the needs of young people are not always
               prioritized and are often misunderstood in conflict-affected environments,  SC designed additional
                                                                                   3
               questions aimed at better understanding their experiences.

               Key Informant Interviews

               Face-to-face  interviews  were  held  in  the  targeted  sub-districts.  Qualitative  data  was  collected
               through KIIs by means of a set of common survey question. The KIIs provided local context on key
               community dynamics, which helped guide and support the root causes and driver’s analysis.

               KII lists were developed by the program steering committee composed of Shaml implementing
               organizations. They included target groups of local councils, teachers, university students and CSO
               staff. 35 KIIs were conducted in total.

                                       Focus group discussions

                                        A  total  of  14  were  subsequently  conducted,  one  in  each  sub-district.
                                       The FGDs had on average 63 participants, and lasted on average for 2


                                       hours, to allow adequate time for each person’s active participation. In
                                       addition, in order to ensure comfortable and active engagement of each
                                       participant in the discussion, FGDs were conducted with both males and

                                       females ranging in age from 16-25.

                                       Shaml used this tool to validate the findings and outcomes and to improve
                                       the analysis of the drivers, contextualize their descriptions, and refine the
                                       prioritizations.
















               3  Reference Sommers, M., 2006, “Youth and Conflict – A Brief Review of the Available Literature,” USAID, Washington, D.C. and UNDESA,
               2003, “Youth and Conflict,” Chapter 14 of the World Youth Report, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York




      27 |   MAPPING YOUTH SITUATION IN NORTHWESTERN SYRIA
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32