Page 193 - International Marketing
P. 193

NPP





                             BRILLIANT'S                      Overseas Market            195

                                 (ii) It may be used as a device for limiting foreign competition in a
                                     market.
                             Arguments in Defense of Dumping
                                 1.  It facilitates the exporters to complete on more favorable terms
                                     with local and foreign competitors in the market.
                                 2.  The production meant for exports would bring down production
                                     cost per unit of the product.
                                 3.  The consumers in the country where product is dumped, would
                                     appreciate the privilege of buying foreign goods at a low prices in
                                     comparison to normal conditions.
                                 The practice of dumping may be of benefit to the importing economy
                             in its own industry is not developed in the field to meet the local needs.
                             But, if the country produces sufficiently to cater to the demand of the local
                             market, then it becomes essential to protect the industry from the foreign
                             competitors and this can be done by bringing anti-dumping legislations.
                                 In practice, the producers facing the anti-dumping legislations have
                             developed a number of ways to defeat these provisions. One of the most
                             common approach in the product differentiation from the one sold in the
                             domestic  market. Another tactics employed  is to make agents  and
                             distributors and extend credit to them.
                             Anti-dumping duty
                                 In the 1980's and early 1990s, 80 percent of antidumping charges
                             were brought by the United States, Canada, the EU and Australia often
                             against Asian countries. However many of the new cases of anti-dumping
                             have been brought to the WTO by developing countries such as South
                             Africa, India, Brazil, Indonesia and Mexico. The United States, the EU,
                             Canada and Australia have brought less than one- third of the cases.
                             Forty three of the cases were brought against the EU and its members.
                                 There are numerous instances of countries levying charges of dumping
                             against china, Japan and even United States. India has been taking various
                             actions against Chinese exporters of different commodities to restrict the
                             damage caused to a range of domestic industry.
                                 For instance, the imposition of anti-dumping duty on nylon tyres
                             cord, rubber  chemicals and even an automotive tyres  by the  Indian
                             Government authorities against the imports from China.
                             Indian experiences with dumping and anti-dumping
                                 Dumping has become a major issue in India in the post liberalization
                             period. Developing nations like India that had erected high tariff and non-
   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198