Page 365 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 365

150        SAMAGRA  TILAK- 2 •  THE  ARCTIC  HOME
             (full of waters) and became vichak~hatJam or far-seeing.  We have
             seen that the sun,  as represented by Dirghatamas, grew old in the
             tenth month and riding on aerial waters went into the ocean. The
             same  idea  is  expressed  in  the  present  verse  which  describes  two
             different  views  about the  nature  of the year,  one of five  and the
             other of six  seasons and contrasts their leading features with each
             other. Thus pare ardhe is contrasted with upare ardhe in the  second
             line, pancha-padam (compare panchdre in the next verse, i. e.  ~ig­
             Veda I, 164, 13) with ~Juuf-are, and pur£~hi1Jam with vichakjh01Jfl"'.
             In  short,  the  verse  under  consideration  describes  the  year  either
             ( 1 ) as five-footed, and lying in waters in the farther part of heaven
             or ( 2) as mounted on a six-spoked car and far-seeing in the neare~
             part of the heaven.  These two descriptions cannot evidently apply
             to seasons in one and the same place, and the artifice of combining
             two  consecutive  seasons  cannot be  accepted  as  a  solution  of the
             question.  Five  seasons  and  ten  months  followed  by  the  watery
             residence of the sun or dark nights, is what is  precisely  described in
             the first half of this passage (I, 164,  12 ), and, from what has been
             said hitherto, it will  be easily  seen that it is the Arctic year of ten
             months that is  here  described. The verse,  and especially  the con-
             trast between purf~hi,;Jam and vickhak~hlll}am,  does  not  appear to
             have attracted the attention it deserves. But in the light of the Arctic
             theory the description is now as intelligible as any. The Vedic bards
             have here preserved for us the memory of a year of five  seasons  or
             ten months,  although their  year  had  long been changed  into  one
             of twelve  months.  The  explanation  given  in  the  Br~hmapas are
             all  so  many post-facto devices  to account for the mention of five
             seasons in the Rig-Veda, and I do not think we are bound to accept
             them when the fact  of five  seasons can be better accounted for.  I
             have  remarked  before  that  in  searching  for  evidence  of ancient
             traditions we  must expect to  find  later traditions associated  with
             them,  and  Rig.  I,  164,  12,  discussed  above,  is  a good  illustration
             of this remark.  The first line of the verse,  though it speaks of five
             seasons, describes the year as twelve-formed; while the second line,
             which  deals  with  a  year  of six  seasons  or twelve  months,  speaks
             of it as ' seven-wheeled, ' that is made up of seven months or seven
             suns, or seven rays of the sun. This may appear rather inconsistent
             at the  first  sight;  but the  history  of words  in  any  language  will
             show that old expressions are preserved in the language long after
             they have ceased to denote the ideas primarily expressed  by them.
   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370