Page 173 - Konferensiya to'plami - 1 (ASR)
P. 173

of English, while scholars like Kononov (1960), Mahmudov (2008), and Jo‘rayev (2012)
            have explored the evolution of the Uzbek language.
                  English language development is generally divided into:
                  Old English (450–1100) – Strong Germanic and Norse influences.
                  Middle  English (1100–1500)  –  Norman conquest  introduced  a  vast  number  of
            French loanwords.
                  Modern  English  (1500–present)  –  The  Renaissance,  colonialism,  and
            globalization expanded the lexicon.
                  Similarly, Uzbek language evolution is categorized into:
                  Old Turkic period (9th–13th centuries) – Influenced by ancient Turkic scripts.
                  Chagatai  period  (14th–18th  centuries)  –  Dominance  of  Persian  and  Arabic
            vocabulary.
                  Modern Uzbek (19th century–present) – Standardization and the transition from
            Cyrillic to Latin script.
                  Sociolinguistic studies, such as Graddol (2006) on English and Sodiqova (2020)
            on Uzbek, highlight the contemporary roles of these languages and their adaptation
            to globalization.

                  METHODOLOGY
                  This  research  employs  a  qualitative  and  quantitative  approach,  utilizing  the
            following methods:
                  Historical  Comparative  Analysis  –  Comparison  of  the  diachronic  changes  in
            English and Uzbek.
                  Linguistic  Analysis  –  Examination  of  phonetic,  morphological,  and  syntactic
            transformations.
                  Sociolinguistic  Study  –  Analysis  of  contemporary  usage  in society,  education,
            and media.
                  Corpus Linguistics – Investigation of vocabulary frequency and word borrowing
            trends.

                  ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
                  The  evolution  of  English  and  Uzbek  has  been  shaped  by  historical  events,
            foreign  influences,  and  globalization.  Both  languages  have  undergone  significant
            lexical and structural transformations over time.
                  1. Diachronic Development: English has been influenced by Latin, French, and
            Germanic languages, expanding its vocabulary through historical periods such as the
            Industrial Revolution and the digital age. Uzbek has incorporated Arabic, Persian, and
            Russian elements, with the Soviet era introducing many loanwords. However, post-
            independence reforms have focused on linguistic purification and modernization.
                  2. Synchronic Analysis: English functions as a global lingua franca, widely used
            in  business,  education,  and  international  institutions.  It  continues  to  evolve  with
            technological advancements and internet culture.
                  Uzbek is undergoing lexical modernization by integrating English loanwords.
            Language  policies  emphasize  its  role  as  a  national  identity  marker,  promoting  its
            presence in digital platforms and academia.
                  3. Globalization and Language Change: English maintains its global dominance
            in  communication,  education,  and  technology.  Uzbek  is  developing  through                    171
            government  efforts  such  as  transitioning  to  the  Latin  script,  promoting  its  use  in


                                                                                                           I SHO‘BA:

                                                                                     Tilshunoslikning nazariy va amaliy masalalari

                                                                                         https://www.asr-conference.com/
   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178