Page 293 - Installation Training Binder FIT1-3
P. 293

APPLICATION BRIEF 1002


                                                                      The High Lifecycle Cost of Epoxy Spill Containment




      The High Lifecycle Cost of Epoxy Spill Containment


      Introduction:                                              Solutions:

      Epoxy type spill containment, while old technology, is often still   A UL Listed spill containment solution utilizes a thick, puncture
      specied and purchased as the low cost solution.  However, higher   resistant liner that provides lower installation times and
      labor and maintenance costs drive the Total Cost of Ownership   maintenance.  A UL Listed spill containment system also provides:
      much higher than that of a UL Listed system.  Without proper care,   • High reliability
      a potential for higher cost of cleanup and intrinsic damage exists.
                                                                  • Code compliance
                                                                  • Lower lifecycle costs
      Diculties with Epoxy:
      Epoxy spill containment is viewed as a low cost solution since the   Benets:
      material costs are lower than a liner based system.  The labor costs   Table 1 demonstrates that overall costs are lower for a UL Listed
      are either overlooked or not considered to better leverage the bid.    liner based spill containment system when installation labor is
      Epoxy spill containment is old technology and requires much   considered.  Another consideration not shown below is the added
      labor to install and maintain.  Since epoxy is a coated surface   drying time which could add 3 or more days to the project
      application, expansion or seismic cracking of the concrete   timeline and cost.
      sub-oor will potentially cause a breach.

      Proper preparation of concrete substrate must follow the
      following procedures:                                       Application = Flooded Batteries
                                                                  Rack Size = 20” x 192” - Containment Size = 24” x 196”
       • ASTM D4258 Standard Practice for Cleaning Concrete       Case 1           Eagle Liner System  Condor Epoxy
       • ASTM D4259 Standard Practice for Abrading Concrete       Initial Cost *           $1,940.00           $1,684.00
       • ASTM D4260 Standard Practice for Etching Concrete        FloorPrep (ASTM)  n/a    n/a        6 hrs.   $450.00
       • ASTM F1869 Standard Test Method for Measuring Moisture   Barrier Installation  8 hrs.  $600.00  10 hrs.  $750.00
                                                                  Epoxy            n/a     n/a        3 hrs.   $225.00
      Additional difficulties with epoxy are:                       Additional Travel  n/a   n/a        2 hrs.   $150.00
                                                                  Total                $2,540.00           $3,259.00
         “How the substrate is prepared is as important as the
         product itself!”
                                                                 Analysis:
       • Non-uniform thickness
       • 72 hour drying time increases installation duration and time  The total installed cost of epoxy spill containment systems exceeds
       • Ventilation required during installation                the cost of liner based system when considering the cost of
       • Potential cracking over time                            installation.  UL Listed spill containment systems are
       • Rails typically not removable due to sealant and glue down.  recommended to provide a lower cost of ownership.
      Impact:

      Epoxy applications are labor intensive considering the preparation
      and installation.  Since an epoxy based spill containment system is
      not UL listed, it may not be acceptable in many cities or facilities.
      Additional floor prep and lower reliability causes the following
      impact:
       • Less flexibility in project planning
       • Higher installation costs
       • Higher maintenance costs
       • Non-UL Listed application
   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298