Page 148 - Records of Bahrain (4) (i)_Neat
P. 148

136                       Records of Bahrain

                    Khan Sahib YUeuf Kano;> lor example, Invariably decline to ;,‘v
                    assist. The only hope of oDtaining an unbiassed opinion
                    would have ooen to appoint persons who are not Bahrain
                     subjects and this would have been severely criticised. Owing
                     to the nature of the crime it was obvious that no direct
                     evidence could ue obtained, and the Sunni members would be
                     certain to take advantage of thi6 fact to give a non­
                     committal report on which Hamad could not take any action,
                     he feared that this would become a precedent and in the
                     future accused persons or communities might demand that the
                     matter be referred to a similar Majlis, & as there i6 little
                     possibility or any such Majlis in Bahrain giving a decision
                     against Sunnis, whatever the nature of the ofience, no
                     punishment would result and crime would oe encouraged. On
                     the other hand if he made every endeavour to trace the
                     culprits, and succeeded in doing so, and held a trial and
                     himself punished, them, the result would oe a deterrent and
                     increase his personal preBtige. Shaikh Hamad, by public
                     offer of a large reward, and by employment of secret agents,
                                  he
                     has done all</ilm could to trace the culprits. Although
                     everything pointed to the crime having been committed by
                     inhabitants of sudaiyeh or at their instigation, it has been
                     Impossible to obtain any proof. Meanwhile the sitrah outrage
                     has occurred. The accused made some slight attempt to ask
                     for the case to be referred either to the Shara or a Majlis,
                     out Shaik Hamad rightly realised that it would drag on inter-
                     manaDly, and probably result in the culprits escaping
                     adequate punishment. This, in turn, would 6till further
                     encourage similar outrages and he (Hamad) felt that ultimate­
                     ly would be held responsible for failure to maintain order.
                     He has therefore dealt with the matter himself, as already
                     reported. His action appears to have considerably frightened
                     those who approved of the outrage. Both Shaiks Hamad and
                     Aodulla tell me that there is no doubt but that Shaik Ea6a's
                     wife, with the connivance of Shaik Easa, encouraged Shaik
                                                                 . Khalid
   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153