Page 279 - 5 Persian Trade rep BUSHIRE I_Neat
P. 279

7
                     SnirriNO.              !             Lighterage.
          ISO steamships with a total tonnage of 201,035  Croat trouble and inconvenience were experienced
        Ions entered the port during March 101011. as! in April to October 1010 over lighterage at the outer
             178 with a tonnage of  238,703 tons in 1009- !' a-.cliorace on several occasions when steamers from
        j0:  179 strain*vessels cleared the port with a total !• the United kingdom were unable to  cotuo into the
        tonnage of 2*71,700 tons ns compared with 123 vessels  ^ inner roadstead, and this resulted  in the partial
        and   107,969 tons in 1000*10.  British shipping in- !j boycott of one British Company  during several
        creased from 1G3 vessels with 200,135 to»3 to 1G5 months. The Persian landing contractor (agent of
        vessels and 228*978 tons.           j the consignees) refused to bear the expense of the
         The number of German vessels entering the port   diflercncc of lighterage between the outer and inner
        teas 11 ns against 10 in 1900*10. Russian sailings   anchorage (a distance of about 5 miles), and the
        .till number 4 per annum, the subsidy to the Gulf   chipping Companies consider themselves exempt from
        branch of the Russian Steamship Company having   nil responsibility under the terms of their bills of
        been renewed by the Russian Government.  lading.
         The number of British steamships bringing cargo   An ac tive agitation was kept up by the local lighter­
                                             men and Persian merchants, and showed only too
        fiom the United Kingdom direct was 3G.   j  clearly lie need of placing lighterage under inde­
         In March 1011 certain influential Arabs trading !   pendent European management. Steamers heavily
        between Bombay and the Gulf issued a prospectus for (   loaded car.not, as a rule, make the shallow inner
        sn “Arab Steamship Company Limited ” with a ;   anchorage, and the greater distance from the shore at
        capital of £G6,0G«). Supposed grievances against j   which they then lie not only involves risks in lighter­
        jbeir treatment by the British India Steam Naviga- I   ing. but also great delay to steamers, and overcarriage
        aon Company Limited seem to have prompted this   frequently results. Any scheme therefore by which
        action by the Arabs. Two or three steamers have ;  steamer companies combine to clTcet jointly their
        nnee been purchase*! and one sent round the Gulf, j o;r:j ]an,fc,2 arrangements must, if it is to work real
        but t.i^re are no signs at present of the Company ■ pre-zress <r. the present unsuti-factorv state of affairs,
        utamir.g any real importance in the Gulf trade. , in-:.;,Ic r.-:, ker Bsh:eraae by means of a steam-tug or
         At the end of the period under review a change ;! stesm-Iigli^r.
        x.vs nr. 1c in i:.? British India Steam Navigation Com- ' ;| The Ml wing is the schedule of present lighterage
        :«ny’s mail sc:vice : the weekly fast mails now call at   I rates whi'h could advantageously be modified; and
        LL'igah up an 1 down, while the slow mail steamers   j lb? scale f:r wharfage, manipulation in the Customs
        ■cargo vessels) only visit the various ports once a   I and delivery at merchants’ warehouses as regards the
        tort night, instead of weekly as heretofore.  i prir.cip.il hems of import: exported goods are cleared
         Freights for general cargo to the United Kingdom  I and lightered directly by the exporters interested.
        If direc t British steamers opened at 20 shillings per
        ton, and continued so till the cod of 1910. Freight   y.B.—1 Kran=approxiraatcIy 41d.
        cn wheat rose from 15 shillings in August to 17s. Cd.
                                                                        Wharfage,
        h September and 20s. in November. In January          Lighterage.  SWSirCT-ATIOS
        1911 there was a rise for general cargo to 25s. and            AND DELI VERT.
        cnium was 2C-*. per chest.
         The following table gives a comparison of rates to   Cottons, TTooUrn-% dc-  Kraus. Cents. Krans. Centa
        the United Kingdom for the past few years:—  (i) Bales of 2(0 pieces .  1  0  4  30
                                             (ii)   „ „ J30 „  1    0    3    10
                                 £    £      (iu)  „ w 25 „    I    0    1   00
        1.=00-07            . 1 10 Oto   0 0  (it) White shirting, Mexi­
        1107-08             .1   0 0 „  0 15  0  can?, 100 pieces .  1  0  2  50
        IS0S-09             . 0  15 0 „  0 17  6  (r) Ordinary small biles
        1909-10             . 0  17 C „  1 0  0  prepared lea* one mule-
        1510-11             . 1   0 0 „  1 5  0  load ....     0    15   0   60
                                             (vi) Ya rn, 40 pieces, about
         Rates for general cargo to India continued atRs. 10   320lbs.  .  0  60  1  76
                                               Yarn, TO pieces, about
        per ton of 40 cubic feet, or 20 cwts., but the follow­  240IU.  0  50  1
       ing were special rates :—               Yam. 20 pieces, about         10
                                                 ICO lbs.      0   25    0   85
                              Ra.            (vii) Canvas empty acts   1  0  1  90
        Efclcs, by fast (znaO) steamer .   . 15 to 17   (viuj Taper; large bak-s .  0  60  1  46
           by slow £ learner .  . 12.             „ rmall bales .  0  25  0  70
       Skins......................................  . 25.
       Cotton........................................  . 2 to 2-4 per bale.
       P-osewattx .         . 1 per case : I Re. per
                               carboy.                         0   16    0   46
       Optus to Hongkong    . 25 per cheat.
   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284