Page 116 - Arabiab Studies (IV)
P. 116

106                                      Arabian Studies IV
                 Government’s pursuance of socialist policies on the island led to
                 the nationalization of even the smallest shops and fishing boats
                 which antagonized the islanders and so, during the frontier
                 incidents between the two Yemens in the autumn of 1972, the
                 .slanders requested the Y.A.R. Government to take over the
                 administration of the island. This was done, since when Kamaran
                 returned to the rule of $an‘a’ for the first time since 1832.129 The
                 stability and future sovereignty of the island can only be settled if
                 plans for the unification of the two Yemens materialize so that the
                 two states have no longer counter claims against each other over
                 the sovereignty of Kamaran.



                                         APPENDIX

                  During the 19th century a rumour developed that Kamaran island
                  had been included in the marriage dowry of Catherine of Braganza
                  to Charles II of England. This has been taken up more recently by
                  Yemeni writers.130 There is no evidence for such statements.
                  According to the Portuguese Quadro Elementar das Relagiones e
                  Diplomaticas de Portugal,131 only Bombay and Tangiers were
                  included in the dowry. This is confirmed by de la Cl£re in his
                  Histoire Generate de Portugal.132
                    Following the British occupation of Kamaran in 1915, the
                  Government of India attempted to establish the truth or otherwise
                  of statements in a number of publications of the previous century
                  that Kamaran had fallen under British occupation in the
                  nineteenth century. In the course of its research the Government of
                  India unearthed a number of books which pronounced that
                  Kamaran had indeed been a British possession: the outcome of the
                  Government’s research was that Britain had neither claimed nor
                  occupied Kamaran before 1915. The present writer also concurs in
                  this conclusion.133 Further evidence comes from Percy Badger, who
                  reported in a memorandum that the Turks ‘could fairly claim’ the
                  seaboard from Suez to al-Mukha in 1872.134
                    It is perhaps worth recording those publications in which
                  Kamaran is erroneously stated to have been British territory.
                  (a)  Kilpert, Graf and Bruhn’s Hand Atlas, 42nd edition, issued in
                  1856-64, in which Kamaran is marked as a British possession on
                  the map of Africa.
                  (b)  Vivien de St. Martin, in his Nouvelle Dictionnaire de
                  Gdographie Universelle, 1879, says of Kamaran ‘Les Anglais en
                  ont pris possession depuis quelques ann6es.’
                  (c)  La Grande Encyclopedic, VIII, with a British Museum date








                                                                                  i
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121