Page 93 - Arabian Studies (I)
P. 93

Bayasirah and BayadTr                                          79

       dominant status. Initially many non-Arabs resisted Islam and were
       either enslaved or placed in a client status to the Arab tribes;
       however this did not last long. The whole social picture soon began
       to change as the people of the Arabian Peninsula came to accept
       Islam and as the old socio-ethnic groupings broke down and the
       ‘racial’ purity of the Arabs weakened. The ‘racial’ distinctions
       between the Semitic peoples of the steppes were amongst the first to
       disappear, and groups like the Mahrah were deliberately incorporated
       into a wider Arab nation symbolised by a spurious genealogy. In the
       littoral fringe of the Gulf, where the Arabs had already started to
       integrate with the local populations in pre-Islamic times, the process
       of assimilation accelerated and gave rise to new groupings like the
       Huwalah (of reputedly mixed Persian Arab descent). On the other
       hand these processes of assimilation did not necessarily break down
       certain racial or class barriers that had been clearly established in
       pre-Islamic times in the way described by HamdanI and Thomas in
       their accounts of the peopling of Dhofar. Although it may have been
       true that all peoples who resisted Islam were provisionally reduced
       nominally to a common status, to invoke such a cause for explaining
       the present condition of the bayasirah is pure local rationalisation:
       the real reason why they were rejected by the Arabs and others was
       that they had no known racial origins and this is indicated by their
       very name, which in early Islamic times designated impure breed.2
       The bayasirah were therefore spurned by those who had asl, Arabs,
       Persians and the like: between the latter, on the other hand, a certain
       amount of intermarriage attenuated their original mutual exclusive­
       ness.
          However, the fact that the bayasirah formed a rejected group by
       no means implies that they were themselves a single people. HamdanI
       is just as correct when he says that the original inhabitants of Raisut
       were bayasirah as are the LTsan al-‘Arab and the Taj al-'arus (art.
       bayasirah) when they say that the bayasirah are a people (jil) of Sind
       from whom the nawkhudhas (ships’ captains) recruited mercenary
       fighting sailors: this too is why there are differences amongst the
       various bay sari groups in Oman today. In the view of the writer the
       bayasirah are the vestigial souche of peoples who lived in the general
       area of the Gulf before the arrival of the Semitic and Indo-Aryan
       groups who came to dominate them. Perhaps they are to be
       identified with the Ichthyophagi who, from reports in Pliny, Strabo,
       Ptolemy and the Periplus of the Erythrean Sea, formed one of the
       three major ethnic groupings of southern and eastern Arabia. Such a
       tripartite division also appears in the traditional and written records of
       the area where the Arabs, the proto-Arabs (that is the Semites of the
       desert borderlands who were subsequently incorporated into Arab
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98