Page 222 - Coincidences in the Bible and in Biblical Hebrew
P. 222

201
          CHAPTER 14  IN THE BEGINNING …
          CHAPTER 14   IN THE BEGINNING …                                   201
          good demonstration of that is given by the prophet Isaiah, in one of the most
          strongly expressed statements about the relationship between God and the people
          of Israel: “Every one that is called by my name: for my glory I have created him, I
          have formed him; yea, I have made him” (Isa. 43:7).
             In  the  Hebrew  language,  each  of  these  verbs  carries  distinct  and  different
          important  meaning.  In  particular,  there  is  strong  distinction  between  creating
          and doing. The quotation from Isaiah makes it clear that in the book of Genesis
          what we call “sky,” which God called “Heaven,” was made (not created), and it
          was “made” after “the heaven” (whatever that term means) had been “created.”
          (Capitalization of “heaven” (and later “earth”), when it occurs, follows the tradi-
          tional biblical English translation; there is no similar capitalization in the original
          Hebrew text.)
             The same distinction extends to Earth. First, God created “the earth” (verse 1),
          then,
             “And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto
          one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so. And God called the dry land
          Earth” (Gen. 1:9, 10).
             Again, God made “dry land” and named it “Earth,” but there is no indica-
          tion that this “Earth” was created. Furthermore, obviously making “Earth” (dry

          land) is distinct from creating “the earth,” as depicted in the first two verses of
          Genesis. If that were not so, the Bible would then be insinuating that “Heaven”
          and “Earth” were created twice!

             Two major qualifications thus seem to emerge on a careful reading of the text.
          First, “the heaven” and “the earth” were created. However there is no qualification


          in the text as to the nature of “the heaven,” and only one qualification is given
                                                           2
                                                 1
          about  “the  earth”—namely,  that  it  was  tohu   and  bohu.   Secondly,  God  made
          the sky, which he called just “Heaven,” and the “dry land,” which he called just
          “Earth.” These were made after the creation, and one is only left to wonder, for
          lack of any source of information , why the Divine “chose” to call the sky by the
          same name as the created “heaven.” Similarly, what are the lines of correspondence
          that “motivated” calling “Earth,” as the term is commonly used today, by the

          same name as the “created earth,” related to in the first verse of Genesis? We will
          attempt some explanation regarding “Earth” later on.
             Having  made  the  distinction  between  the  two  concepts  of  “Heaven”  and

          “Earth”—one which was “created” but remains mysterious and mostly undefined,
          and another that in no uncertain terms is explicitly described, yet unrelated to cre-
          ation—we may proceed to analyze the linguistic contents of the only description
                                                               1
          given for the creation—namely, that the created earth was tohu  and bohu. 2
             We start by revealing a most bizarre characteristic about the only description
          of the moment of creation. A “root” analysis of verbs derived from the same roots
   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227