Page 225 - Coincidences in the Bible and in Biblical Hebrew
P. 225

COINCIDENCES IN THE BIBLE AND IN BIBLICAL HEBREW
          204
          204                            COINCIDENCES IN THE BIBLE AND IN BIBLICAL HEBREW
          modern Hebrew, another meaning was derived from the root S.M.M, based on an
          extension of the root into a four-letter root S.A.M.M, meaning “to be bored.”
                                                             2
                                                    1
            A  similar  fate  befell  verbs  derived  from  tohu   and  bohu   in  the  nonbiblical
          Hebrew language. Ancient written Jewish texts, as well as modern Hebrew, use
          verbs derived from these words to imply wondering because no sense can be made
                                             1
          of the observed (verbs derived from tohu)  and purposeless gazing about, because
          there is nothing to look at (verbs derived from bohu). 2
            Let us explore the meanings of these verbs.
                          5
            The  verb  tahah   means,  in  Hebrew  (singular,  masculine)  “was  astonished,
          amazed,” but also “he reflected upon, trying to make sense.” Thus, one may say

               18
          “Tahiti  [I was wondering] what did she really mean by that.” An often used
                                             19
          idiom in Hebrew is “Tahiti al kankano,”  meaning, “I was wondering what is
                                               9
          the essence of this man.” The verb bahah  similarly means “he was surprised,
          amazed.” But it also means, in Hebrew, “he gazed purposelessly in the air because
          he had nothing to look at.” Thus, one may say: “I was sitting at the dentist clinic,
                         20
          and I gazed [bahiti ] at the wall.”
            It is conceivable how all these are associated with wilderness. But what does
          it mean that at the moment of creation, one would be wondering and amazed
          because it looks like desert—namely, there was no form and contents, and, in
          other words, “there was nothing to observe”?


          14.2  Cosmological Theories of the Beginning
                                                              13
          The  bizarre  coincidence  is  now  in  full  view.  Tohu  va-vohu,   “devoid  of  form

          and  contents,”  is  exactly  how  modern  cosmology  describes  the  first  moments

          of  creation. In fact, if one were asked to describe the universe at the moment
          of  creation or shortly thereafter, he or she could not have provided, in light of
            modern cosmology, a better depiction than the universe as in a state devoid of
          form and contents to such a degree that would make an observer wonder, just
          as in the desert, what sense can be made of the observed. Furthermore, he or she
          would gaze purposelessly, because “there is nothing to see.”
            The key word here is uniformity. Modern cosmological theories speak about

          lack of any information in the just created universe because of the extremely, and

          unexplainable, uniformity in the distribution of energy and plasma . This unifor-
          mity is supported both by theory and by experimental observations, and it is far
          from being intuitive.


            Let us first relate to how modern cosmologists describe the first moments of

          creation. As we do not wish to delve into exact scientific descriptions, instead
                                                -43
          of  engaging  in  exact  time  periods  (like  10 ,  when  the  breaking  of  the  ten
   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230