Page 45 - Producing a Video to Communicate a New Model of Coaching to GAA Coaches
P. 45

Anonymous Questionnaire
                        I utilised an anonymous survey with coaches on the Award 2 Pilot Coaching course to

                                                                                                      10’
                        gather information to assess how effectively my video communicates the ‘Coach
                        model. The survey comprised of the following questions, the answers to which provide
                        evidence of the Transformational impact of my research:

                           ·         Did the video communicate the ‘Coach  10’  Model of effective coaching well?
                           ·         What aspects of the video do you feel helped/did not help communicate the

                                  model effectively?
                           ·         Describe how the video style helped/did not help communicate the model

                                  effectively?

                           ·         What aspects of the video would you change to help communicate the model
                                      more effectively?


                        Reflecting the opinions of a subset of coaches for whom the video is ultimately being

                        produced, the data from the survey provides an insight as to the impact of the resource
                        on their understanding of the ‘Coach  10’  model and their own practice.





                        3.5.3        Validity, Rigour, Ethics & Quality
                        As my research is not informed by objectively verifiable quantitative data I employed

                        other means to ensure my claims are evidence-based and worthy.


                        Validity

                        Seeking to improve practice within my organisation the validity of my claims is subject

                        to the opinion of my colleagues and collaborators in the first instance. As an exercise
                        conducted within the environment of the MEME Programme and under the auspices of

                        D.C.U. the perspective of my peers and University representatives must also be taken
                        into account. Throughout the social validation meetings organised within the MEME

                        Programme I utilised Habermas’ (1976) four criteria of social validity to reinforce the
                        validity of my claims. Those criteria are: Comprehensibility, Truthfulness,

                        Appropriateness and Authenticity. Through a process of dialogue between myself and

                        my colleagues and peers my claims as to my work were challenged for understanding
                        and clarity (Comprehensibility), for evidence (Truthfulness), for relevance and




                                                                 33
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50