Page 23 - Barr&Barr_Technical Proposal

Fails to Achieve Needs Fully Achieve Freq Exceeds Cons Exceed
Expectation Improvement Expectation Expectation Expectation
1 2 3 4 5
4 MBE/WBE Participation 3
Rate this contractor's MBE/WBE solicitation effort and participation for this
project for, Project Team, Subcontractors, Material Vendors

Comments:

The particcipation was not tracked. A N/A rating is more applicable but could not be used.
5 Safety 3
Rate this contractor's performance in regards to project safety
a. Timely submission of site specific safety program
b. Knowledge of OSHA standards
c. Implementation of safety rules and regulations
d. Promotion and creation of safety awareness
e. Daily overall housekeeping
f. Safety record
g. Response to safety concerns
h. Awareness of public safety

Comments:
Overall took corrective measures to effectively manage safety concerns and respond to safety
notifications.

6 Contract Administration 3
Rate this contractor's performance in regards to contract
administration as per criteria below
a. Timely submission of complet and correct
documentation required for insurance and bond
b. Change order processing
c. Timely submission of RFI's, Shop Drawings,
and change orders
d. Subcontractor payments made promptly
e. Timely submission of complete and correct payment
applications
f. Quality of paperwork

Comments:

Overall good.
7 Working Relationships 4
Rate this contractor's working relationships with other parties
(Cornell, Design Team, subcontractors,ect.)
Comments:

The team cooperated fully and professionally with the Owner's Representative's field team as well as
the Rutgers' team.

Page 3 of 5