Page 22 - Barr&Barr_Technical Proposal
P. 22

Performance Evaluation
     Please give one rating for each category. Add comments as required to justify your rating.

                                          Fails to Achieve  Needs  Fully Achieve Freq Exceeds  Cons Exceed
                                           Expectation  Improvement  Expectation  Expectation  Expectation
                                              1         2        3       4          5

        1    Quality of Workmanship                                                                               3
             Rate this contractor's performance in regards to quality of work
                     a. Compliance with project drawings and specifications
                     b. Workmanship quality and accuracy
                     c. Tools- quality and sufficient quantity
                     d. Equipment - sufficient quantity and operating condition
                     e. Quality of jobsite craft personnel

             Comments:
             The contractor's attitude and overall performance was toward providing the client with a good quality
             product. Where quality was an issue, the contractor made every effort to make corrections.
        2    Scheduling/Productivity                                                                              3
             Rate this contractor's performance with regard to producing and
             meeting contract schedules and milestones
                     a. Project schedule quality and completeness
                     b. Controlling of project schedule
                     c. Manpower allocation for maintaining schedule
                     d. Material deliveries to support project schedule
                     e. Ability to meet substantial completion date and project milestones
                     f. Productivity of work force
                     g. Ability to deal with added work and unforeseen issues.

             Comments:
             This project was a takeover from a terminated General Contractor, so the project was behind. The
             contractor provided a completion schedule that was relatively reasonable and made an effort to work
             extended hours and weekends with a select group of subs to improve and/or stay on schedule.

        3    Subcontractor Management                                                                             3
             Rate this contractor's ability, effort and success in managing and coordinating
             subcontractors (if no subcontractors rate overall management performance)

             Comments:

             Overall good.

        3A   Major subcontractor performance(score not added in final Contractor Evaluation
             For contractor information only
                     a. Plumbing Contractor overall Performance                     3
                     Comments:
                     b. HVAC Contractor overall Performance                         3
                     Comments:
                     c. Electrical Contractor overall Performance                   3

             Comments:
             Initially there was an issue with the performance of the electrical contractor , however it was rectified
             with additional manpower. Overall no issues.














                                                          Page 2 of 5
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27