Page 824 - Area X - H

Ttudent Evaluation B. Student Eval/^ n___
jtruction (70% A+30%B) Instruction (70% m+30%B)
II. Others (20%) II. Others (20%)
A. Research A. Research
B. Extension B. Extension___________
C. Production C. Production
D. Others/Support D. Others/Support______
Average (A, B, C, D) Average (A, B, C, D)
IPCR Rating (I + II) IPCR Rating (I + II) ~
Adjectival Rating Adjectival Rating
Rating Scale for the Final Score: Discussed rating with: Discussed rating with:
4.51 - 5.00 ---- Outstanding (Extraordinary level of achievement)
3.51 - 4 . 5 0 ---- Very Satisfactory (Performance exceeded expectation)
2:51 - 3.50 ---- Satisfactory' (Performance met expectation) PATRICIA A. ALIGUYON.Ph.D. PATRICIA A. ALIGUYON. Ph.D.
1.51 - 2.50 ---- Fair (Performance failed to meet expectation) Employee Employee
1.00 - 1.50 ---- Poor (Performance was consistently below expectation)
Assessed by: Assessed by:
I certify that I discussed my assessment I certify that I discussed my assessment
Note: The functions of the faculty members are to be weighted based on existing policies on of the performance with the employee. of the performance with the employee.
faculty workload.
RICARDO L.ILDEFONSO.Ph.D. RICARDO L.ILDEFONSO.Ph.D.
I. % weight allocation for faculty members: Immediate Supervisor Immediate Supervisor
In s tru c to r Asst. Prof. Asso. Prof. Prof. Univ. Prof.
1. Instruction 80% 70% 50% 35% 30%
2. Research 1 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 40% 45%
3. Extension 5%* 1 0 %* 1 0 %* 1 0 %* 1 0%*
4. Production - 5%* 1 0 %* 5%* 5%*
5. Others 5%* 5%* 1 0 %* 1 0 %* 1 0 %*
II. For faculty members with designation, % weight allocation shall be pro-rated based on
approved workload.