Page 946 - Area X - H
P. 946

-*■



                                             Annual Performance Assessment Report
                DELIVERY UNIT: OFFICE OF THE CAMPUS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-POTIA CAMPUS

                                                Actual AccompHshmenti       Annual Actua
                    MFO/PERFORMANCE INDICATOR                      2016 Target  AccompHshm  Annual  Remarks
                                                Jan. to June  July to Dae.      _« .   Rating
                                                                               •nt
                I.STRATEGIC PRIORITY FUNCTIONS
                MF01 - HIGHER EDUCATION SERVICES
                   % of the programs reviewed and revised
                   with partners/stakeholders (provided
                   CHED will give prototype Curricula)
                       _______________________________
                   No. of programs proposed
                      % rate above NPR (performance in
                      licensure examinations)
                        a. ALE                                                              no takers
                        b. FLE                                           7%       10%      5
                        c. LET-BSE                                                         1
                        d. LET-BEE                                      35%       32%      2
                        e. LE-Criminology                               45%       25%      2
                        f. Midwifery                                    20%        8%      1
                   % of passers over No. of takers (TESDA)
                        >BS-lnformation Technology
                        Computer Servicing
                       >BSHRM                                 70%       70%       70%      3
                       Housekeeping                           35%       30%       35%      4
                       Bread and Pastry
                       >BSHT                                            70%                 no exam taken
                     % of preparation of
                                                                          n         < i
                    graduate/undergraduate programs             3         2         3      5
                    accredited bv AACCUP:
                      a. with candidate status accredited
                                                                          2         4      5
                      level 1
                      b. re-accredited to:
                       Level 2                                            2         5      5
                       Level 3                                            3                 no result yet
                       No. of programs to be evaluated
                       by CHED (as scheduled by                           2         4     5
                       CHED)
                       Percentage of accomplishment of
                       documents to comply with COD
                       reouirements
                       BEE/BSE                               100%       10%      100%     5
                       BSA                                              25%         0      1
                     00% Outcome based syllabi               100%       50%      100%     5
                     to. of IM por faculty submitted for
                                               1/f       1/f      1/f      1/f            3
                     iooroval bv IMs committee
                   % of faculty were rated by their students
                   as excellent every semester (15%)          39%                         5
                   % of faculty rated by their supervisors as
                                                     20%      47%                         5
                   excellent everv semester (20%)
                   % of faculty members attended SWTs
                                               1/f       1/f      If       1/f            5      100%
                   (atteast 1/faculty)
                   % of seminars echoed in SWTs (No. of
                   faculty echoed SWT/Total No. of faculty  1/f  1/f  It   1/f            5
                   attended SWT)
                   No. of faculty on scholarship for PhD  12             8         12     5




     m
   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951