Page 240 - Proceeding of Atrans Young Researcher's Forum 2019_Neat
P. 240

“Transportation for A Better Life:
                                                                              Smart Mobility for Now and Then”

                                                                                    23 August 2019, Bangkok, Thailand

                    Based on the table 4.2, it can be observed   5. Conclusion
             that the coefficient of cost and time are -0.0112866    The objective of the study is to determine the
             and -0.00530629, respectively. Negative sign means   significant  factors  affecting  the  mode  choice  of
             that  as  the  travel  cost  and  time  increases,  the   commuters between Point-to-point Bus Service and
             likelihood of commuters choosing a certain kind of   other modes of transportation in Metro Manila. From
             transportation  decreases  and  this  sign  is  also   a total of 1675 observations analyzed, the following
             applicable  to  any  significant  factors  considered  in   can be concluded from the study:
             the  NLOGIT  model  such  as  Comfort  and  Car
             Ownership. The comfort was considered significant    1.  Travel  time  and  travel  cost  is  inversely
             because a lot of commuters are having a hard time       proportional to the probability of commuters
             using  the  public  mode  of  transportation  and  these   choosing a certain mode of transportation.
             people have their own cars in their household to use   2.  Increase  of  car  ownership  decreases  the
             when travelling. This is very essential in the inverse   probability of commuters to choose P2P as
             proportionality of comfort because there are people     their mode of transportation
             who prefer to use P2P due to it providing personal   3.  Females  will  more  likely  choose  P2P
             space for commuters and avoids overcrowding while       compared to other modes of transportation
             having similar features to that of private and app-  4.  Commuters  who  prioritizes  comfort  will
             related  modes  such  as  Grab.  On  the  other  hand,   most likely choose P2P over other modes of
             positive  sign  of  coefficient  indicates  direct      transportation
             proportionality  between  the  mode  chosen  such  as
             Gender wherein 1 is represented by Female and 0 for   6. Acknowledgement
             Male. Females tend to go to big establishments such
             as malls where the P2P terminals are found due to       The researchers of the study would like to
             activities such as shopping and this was considered   express  their  gratitude  to  Dr.  Alexis  M.  Fillone,
             significant in preferring P2P more than other modes.   Transportation  Division  Head  of  De  La  Salle
             Moreover,  males  have  other  ways  of  recreational   University,  for  sharing  his  support,  insights,  and
             activities such as playing sports where P2P services   expertise with the researchers during the course of
             are not available.                               this study and to Engr. Krister Ian Daniel Z. Roquel,
                                                              Associate  Professional  Lecturer  of  De  La  Salle
                    According to Rumsey (2015), a p-value of   University, for assisting in NLOGIT Modeling.
             less than or equal to 0.05 indicates a strong evidence
             of significance on variables. Since the factors in the   The  researchers  would  also  like  to  thank
             figure above have a p-value equivalent to less than   their family and friends for their continuous support
             0.05,  the  variables  included  in  the  model  are   and to God for making this research possible.
             considered as significant for the choice analysis of
             commuters. Moreover, based on the cost time ratio,
             a commuter is willing to spend approximately 2.13                  References
             pesos per minute of travel saved which is equivalent
             to  127.8  pesos  per  hour.  This  result  means  that   [1]     Patrick,  S.M.  and  Richard,  S.T.  (1998)  New
             reducing travel time compromises the travel cost and   vehicle consumption and fuel efficiency: a nested
             vice versa. With these, the derived following utility   logit approach, Transportation Research Journal
             equations are as follows:                           Part E, Vol.34E, No.1, pp.39-51.
                                                              [2]   James,   H.B.   (1998)   Introduction   to
             U (P2P) = - 0.0112866(COST) -                       Transportation Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New
             0.00530629(TIME) + 0.398411(GENDER) -               York.
             0.113624(CAROWN)                           (1)   [3]      Gregorio, N. (2018). The Rise and Fall of
                                                                 Jeepneys in Metro Manila, Philippines.
             U (OTHERS) =   - 0.0112866(COST) -                  Retrieved from
             0.00530629(TIME) - 0.0457627(COMFORT)  (2)          http://sus.stanford.edu/blog/2018/3/19/the-rise-
                                                                 and-fall-of-jeepneys-in-metro-manila-
                                                                 philippines
                                                              [4]      Banzon, A. (2017, February 18). The P2P
                                                                 bus ride experience. Retrieved November 4,




                                                           215
   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245