Page 23 - Development of a Language Translator from English to Waray

Circulation in Computer Science, Vol.3, No.3, pp: (1-5), May 2018
www.ccsarchive.org

become skillful at using the 4.2.5 Overall mean of factors affecting social
system. commerce
3. I would find the system easy Agree
to use. 4.18 Table 8. Overall mean score of factors affecting social
4. Learning to operate the Agree commerce acceptance of students
system is easy for me. 4.32
Verbal
Mean 4.21 Agree Factors Mean Interpretation
Performance Expectancy 3.62 Agree
Table 5 shows the mean score of students in terms of effort Effort Expectancy 4.21 Agree
expectancy of 4.21 with verbal interpretation as “Agree”.
“Learning to operate the system is easy for me” has the Social Influence 3.76 Agree
highest mean of 4.32 and “It would be easy for me to become Facilitating Conditions 3.56 Agree
skillful at using the system” has lowest mean but both Mean 3.79 Agree
interpreted as “Agree”.
Table 8 shows the overall mean score of factors affecting
4.2.3 Social Influence social commerce acceptance of students in a State University.
Performance expectancy is 3.62, effort expectancy is 4.21,
Table 6. Mean score of students’ social influence social influence is 3.76 and facilitating conditions is 3.56, all
Social Influence Mean Verbal factors has verbal interpretation as “Agree”.
Interpretation
1. People who influence my 4.3.Relationship between sex and factors
behavior think that I should Agree affecting social commerce acceptance
use the system. 3.69
2. People who are important to Table 9. Relationship between sex and factors affecting
me think that I should use the Agree social commerce acceptance
system. 3.69
PEARSON
3. The senior management of CORRELATION SIGNIFICANCE
this business has been helpful Agree Female 0.411184 Moderate
in the use of the system. 3.78
4. In general, the organization Male 0.215309 Low

has supported the use of the Agree
system. 3.90 Table 9 shows the relationship between sex and factors
affecting social commerce acceptance. Male respondents have
Mean 3.76 Agree low significance and female respondents with moderate
significance. Result implies that female respondents has
Table 6 shows the mean score of students in terms of social significant relationship to the factors affecting social
influence has a mean of 3.76 with verbal interpretation as commerce acceptance of students in a State University.
“Agree”. “In general, the organization has supported the use
of the system” has the highest mean of 3.90 and interpreted as 4.4.Relationship between sex and factors
“Agree”. However, “People who influence my behavior think
that I should use the system” and “People who are important affecting social commerce acceptance
to me think that I should use the system” has lowest mean of
3.69 but still “Agree” as construed. Table 10. Relationship between age and factors affecting
social commerce acceptance
4.2.4 Facilitating Conditions
PEARSON SIGNIFICANCE
Table 7. Mean score of students’ facilitating conditions CORRELATION
20 & below 0.215664 Low
Facilitating Conditions Mean Verbal 21-30 0.014173 Negligible
Interpretation 31-40 0.188982 Negligible
1. I have the resources necessary
to use the system. Table 10 shows the relationship between age and the factors
3.86 Agree affecting social commerce acceptance of students. Ages 20
2. I have the knowledge and below has low signification correlation. However, 21-30
necessary to use the system. 3.65 Agree and 41 above years of age has no correlation to the factors.
3. The system is not compatible Result implies that respondents aged 20 and below has
with other systems I use. 3.23 Agree significant relationship to the factors.
4. A specific person (or group)
is available for assistance 5. CONCLUSION
with the system difficulties. 3.50 Agree The study determined that there is significant relationship
Mean 3.56 Agree between sex and age to the factors affecting social commerce
acceptance of students in a State University in the Philippines.
Table 7 shows the mean score of students in terms of Fifty three percent of the respondents are female, and forty
facilitating condition of 3.76 with verbal interpretation as
“Agree”. “I have the resources necessary to use the system” seven percent are male. In terms of age, 20 years and below
has seventy four percent of the respondents and aged 21-30
has the highest mean of 3.86 and interpreted as “Agree”. has 23 percent. The used of User Acceptance of Technology:
However, “The system is not compatible with other systems I
use” has lowest mean of 3.23 but still interpreted as “Agree”. Towards Unified View, determine the factors of the social
commerce acceptance of students in a State University. The

4