Page 17 - The Economist
P. 17

The Economist December 9th 2017                                                              Leaders 17
       2   To begin with, it is an admission offailure. MrTrump is pre-  agree on. In practice the United States, like most other coun-
        judging the outcome of the “ultimate deal” of Israeli-Palestin-  tries, already treats Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. Its diplomats
        ian peace that he claims to be pursuing. He has given Israel the  and politicians—including presidents—routinely meet Israeli
        prize ofrecognition without extractinganythingin return, and  ministers in Jerusalem. Yet if recognition makes little practical
        does not mention Palestinians’ right to statehood. That has  difference, why did MrTrump bother?
        both weakened his own influence in any peace talks and  The answer has nothing to do with American policy in the
        America’s claim to be a fair mediator between the Israelis and  Middle East and everything to do with domestic politics. At
        the Palestinians. Second, MrTrump has furtherdiscredited the  home Mr Trump has struggled to enact his promises because
        already feeble Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, and all  of resistance in Congress and the courts. Abroad, though, he
        those who argue thatPalestinian aspirationscan be met byne-  has now honoured a radical promise—one his predecessors
        gotiationratherthanviolence.Third,hehasembarrassedArab  were too feckless to keep. It helps, too, that his electoral base
        allies, and made it harder for them to move towards a de facto  admires Israel and dislikes Arabs; and that many evangelicals
        alliance with Israel to counteract the expansion ofIran’s influ-  thinkthe ingatheringofthe Jews will hasten the end ofdays.
        ence in the Middle East.                              Mr Trump would have been best advised not to touch Jeru-
           MrTrumpperhapscalculatesthatArabregimesaretoocon-  salem at all. It should have been left as the crown in a final
        cerned with other crises to bother with Palestine, and that the  peace agreement. But if he must shake things up, then he
        Palestiniansaretoodividedanddispiritedtodomuchaboutit.  should double down on hisradicalism: open notone embassy
        Yet even if the prospect of Palestinian unrest is muted, Mr  in Jerusalem but two. One would manage ties with Israel and
        Trump pointlessly risks stokingviolence.            the other in East Jerusalem would deal with the Palestinian
           Mr Trump is at pains to say that America will accept any fu-  state, which he should also recognise. Two embassies for two
        ture deal on Jerusalem that Israel and the Palestinians can  states fortwo peoples: that would be truly fresh thinking. 7


        The battle in AI
        Giant advantage



        Artificial intelligence looks tailor-made forincumbenttech giants. Howto judge ifthatis a worry
                                   WO letters can add up to a  er: Google) to relax, and search the web using—you can guess.
           Global activity in AI  Tlotofmoney. No area oftech-  Markets with just a handful of firms can be fiercely competi-
           Number of M&A deals
                                nologyishotterthan AI, orartifi-  tive. Aworld in which the same fewnamesduke itout in sever-
                           120
                                cial intelligence. Venture-capital  al industriescould still be a good one forconsumers. Butifpeo-
                           80
                                investment in AI in the first nine  ple rely on one firm’s services like this, and if AI enables that
                           40
                                months of 2017 totalled $7.6bn,  firm to predicttheirneedsand customise itsoffering evermore
                           0
           2010  12  14  16 17*  according to PitchBook, a data  precisely, it will be burdensome to switch to a rival.
                       *To Dec 4th  provider; that compares with  That future is still a long way off. AI programs remain nar-
        full-yearfiguresof$5.4bn in 2016. In the yearto date there have  rowly focused. Moreover, the ability ofthe incumbents to per-
        been $21.3bn in AI-related M&A deals, around 26 times more  petuate theiradvantagesismade uncertain bythree questions.
        than in 2015. In earnings calls public companies now mention  The most important is whether AI will always depend on
        AI farmore often than “bigdata”.                    vast amounts of data. Machines today are usually trained on
           At the heart ofthe frenzy are some familiarnames: the likes  huge datasets, from which they can recognise useful patterns
        ofAlphabet, Amazon, Apple, Facebookand Microsoft. A simi-  such as fraudulent financial transactions. Ifreal-world data re-
        lar, though less transparent, battle is under way in China  main essential to AI, the tech superstars are in clover. They
        amongfirms like Alibaba and Baidu. Several have put AI at the  have vast amounts of the stuff, and are gaining more as they
        centre of their strategies. All are enthusiastic acquirers of AI  push into fresh areas such as health care.
        firms, often in order to snap up the people they employ. They  Acompetingvision ofAIstressessimulations, in which ma-
        see AI as a way to improve their existing services, from cloud  chinesteach themselvesusingsyntheticdata orin virtual envi-
        computingto logistics, and to push into newareas, from auton-  ronments. Early versions of a program developed to play Go,
        omouscarsto augmented reality(see page 61). Manyobservers  an Asian board game, by DeepMind, a unit of Alphabet, were
        fear that, by cementing and extending the power of a handful  trained usingdata from actual games; the latestwassimply giv-
        of giants, AI will hurt competition. That will depend on three  en the rules and started playing Go against itself. Within three
        open questions, involvingone magic ingredient.      days it had surpassed its predecessor, which had itself beaten
                                                            the best player humanity could muster. If this approach is
        AlphaGone                                           widely applicable, or if future AI systems can be trained using
        The tech giants certainly have big advantages in the battle to  sparseramounts ofdata, the tech giants’ edge is blunted.
        develop AI. They have tonnes of data, oodles of computing  But some applications will always require data. How much
        power and boffins aplenty—especially in China, which ex-  ofthe world’s stockofit the tech giants will end up controlling
        pects to charge ahead. Imagine a future, some warn, in which  isthe second question. Theyhave cloutin the consumer realm,
        you are transported everywhere in a Waymo autonomous car  and they keep pushinginto new areas, from Amazon’s interest
        (owner: Alphabet, parent of Google), pay for everything with  in medicine to Microsoft’s purchase of LinkedIn, a profession-
        an Android phone (developer: Google), watch YouTube (own-  al-networking site. But data in the corporate realm are harder 1
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22