Page 16 - The Economist
P. 16

16 Leaders                                                                   The Economist December 9th 2017
       2 tance) tax entirely, the Senate would keep it. It is right to do so,  the bill through barely a day after the forecast was released.
        thoughitwoulddoublethethresholdatwhichthetaxkicksin,  Perhaps, after the failure of health-care reform, they were des-
        from $22.4m (for couples). Third, the Senate has tacked on a re-  perate fora significant legislative achievement.
        peal ofObamacare’sindividualmandate,a fineforAmericans  A lack of consistency makes Republicans seem unprinci-
        who do not buy health insurance even ifthey can afford it.  pled.Theyhave spentthe pastdecade claimingthatthe nation-
           One test of the final bill is its effect on the economy. On the  al debt is among their main concerns. In 2009 they opposed
        onehanditwouldlimitdeductionsinfavourofcutstomargin-  President Barack Obama’s fiscal stimulus, arguing that it was
        al tax rates—a worthwhile reform. On the other it will increase  unaffordable. Yet it cost less than today’s tax bill would. It
        inequality, largely because business-owners tend to be rich,  passed when unemployment was over 8% and interest rates
        and it will add a trillion dollars in public borrowing by 2027,  were stuck near zero. Today unemployment is 4.1% and rates
        accordingto an official projection forthe Senate’s bill.  have started rising because the Federal Reserve is worried
           But there is another test, which is the effect on governance.  about inflation. The Fed will probably raise rates faster after
        The Republicans have argued that theirbill is aimed at helping  the taxbill, limitingthe boost to economic growth.
        middle-class Americans and that it will spark enough eco-  The whiff of self-enrichment does not help. President Do-
        nomic growth to pay for itself. This is belied by experience—  nald Trump assures Americans that the bill will be “not good”
        witnesstheriseindeficitsafterthetaxcutsof1981andtheearly  for his bankbalance. Without seeing his tax returns, that is im-
        2000s (see page 29). Not even economists in sympathetic  possible to know. But he holds interests in around 500 “pass-
        think-tanks believe that the Republican claims will be borne  through” businesses, which are among the main beneficiaries
        out. Steve Mnuchin, the treasury secretary, has failed to pro-  of the tax bill. As a property developer, he is almost uniquely
        duce any analysis justifying his predictions of much higher  fortunate in beingallowed to keep most ofhis taxexemptions.
        growth (his department’s inspector-general is investigating
        why not). The Treasury did, however, delete a study from its  Talking is good
        website that was unhelpful to the administration’s argument.  When Democrats cried foul after the bill passed, Mitch
           All politicians exaggerate the benefits of their policies, and  McConnell, the Senate leader, retorted that: “You complain
        some Republicans have made unconvincing claims about the  about process when you are losing.” Nonsense. A robust and
        rewardsoftaxcutsfordecades.However,inthe1980stheparty  factual debate is essential to good policymaking. The erosion
        undertook a robust debate over the merits of supply-side eco-  ofstandardswill feed on itself. Already, some voices on the left
        nomics, and in the 2000s George W. Bush’s own economists  are saying that deficits should never again stop Democrats
        cautioned against over-rosy growth forecasts. This time, most  from spendingfreely when they are in power. In a country fac-
        Republican senators simply brushed offthe official projection  ingahugelong-term fiscal shortfall, thatisa worrying thought.
        that the bill’s effects would contradict theirsunny promises. In  Democracy requires deliberation, and deliberation re-
        addition, they attacked the independent forecasters whom  quires honesty. After this bill, a great fear of the Founding Fa-
        they have previously championed as a valuable restraint on  thers—a politics of warring factions and interests, scrapping
        self-servingpoliticians. And to minimise scrutiny, they rushed  overthe public purse—looks closerthan ever. 7

        Peace in the Middle East

        This year in Jerusalem



        Donald Trump’s recognition ofJerusalem is reckless
                                 ERUSALEM is both heavenly  lem.Thisoddityisa productofhistory. After1947, when the UN
                               Jand earthly, holy and sinful.  voted to partition the then-British mandate of Palestine, Jeru-
                                 “Ten measures of beauty God  salem wasdeclared an international city, partneither ofthe fu-
                                gave to the world, nine to Jerusa-  ture Jewish state nor of the Arab one. But in the subsequent
                                lem and one to the rest,” saysthe  warIsrael and Jordan divided the cityand two decades later, in
                                Talmud. Sometimes, however, it  the war of 1967, Israel captured and annexed East Jerusalem.
                                seems as if ten measures of suf-  Arab residents were given a special status, but building pro-
                                fering God gave to the world,  jects, population policies and, latterly, the security barrier all
        nine to Jerusalem and one to the rest. The medieval Arab geog-  served to strengthen the Jews in their “eternal and undivided
        rapher, al-Muqaddasi, called the holy city “a golden bowl full  capital”. The Oslo accords of 1993, which created an autono-
        ofscorpions”.                                       mous Palestinian Authority, left the status ofJerusalem as one
           In announcing this week that America recognised Jerusa-  of several “final status issues” to be settled in a permanent
        lem asthe capital ofIsrael, and would startthe process ofmov-  peace between Israel and the Palestinians.
        ing the American embassy there from Tel Aviv (see page 47),  Congress called for the American embassy to be moved to
        President Donald Trump claimed to be honouring Israel’s de-  Jerusalem, and presidential candidates often promised to do
        mocracy. He was, he said, simply acknowledging reality; he  so. In office, though, they always found reasons to delay. Now
        still sought peace between the Palestinians and the Israelis. In  Mr Trump claims to be bringing “very fresh thinking” to the
        fact, his move has the nasty stingofa scorpion.     Middle East: “I’ve judged this course ofaction to be in the best
           Israel isunusual in havinga capital thatisnotrecognised by  interests of the United States of America and the pursuit of
        the rest of the world. No country keeps an embassy in Jerusa-  peace between Israel and the Palestinians.” Itwill help neither. 1
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21