Page 97 - Science
P. 97

RESEARCH | REPORT

        necessary for motor and neuroprosthetic learning  selection by consequence operates on neural ac-  29. R. W. Eaton, T. Libey, E. E. Fetz, J. Neurophysiol. 117, 1112–1125
        (5, 14, 34). Actor-critic reinforcement learning  tivity in the brain (45).  (2017).
        models (35, 36) suggest two sites for VTA-                              30. R. Legenstein, S. M. Chase, A. B. Schwartz, W. Maass,
                                                                                  J. Neurosci. 30, 8400–8410 (2010).
        modulated plasticity: the dorsal striatum (actor),  REFERENCES AND NOTES  31. R. Héliot, K. Ganguly, J. Jimenez, J. M. Carmena,
        which contributes to selection of actions (M1  1. E. L. Thorndike, Psychol. Rev. 2,1–107 (1898).  IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B Cybern. 40,1387–1397
                                            2. B. F. Skinner, The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental
        neural activity patterns), and the ventral striatum  Analysis (Appleton-Century, Oxford, 1938).  (2010).
        (critic), which may evaluate actions on the basis  3. R. G. Cohen, D. Sternad, Exp. Brain Res. 193,69–83  32. S. Yagishita et al., Science 345, 1616–1620 (2014).
        of the value of the environmental states reached  (2009).               33. W. Shen, M. Flajolet, P. Greengard, D. J. Surmeier, Science 321,
                                                                                  848–851 (2008).
        (auditory feedback). Plasticity in dorsal striatum  4. L. Shmuelof, J. W. Krakauer, P. Mazzoni, J. Neurophysiol. 108,  34. F. J. Santos, R. F. Oliveira, X. Jin, R. M. Costa, eLife 4, e09423
                                              578–594 (2012).
        could be mediated by glutamatergic input from  5. R. M. Costa, D. Cohen, M. A. L. Nicolelis, Curr. Biol. 14,  (2015).
        contralateral M1 and dopaminergic input signal-  1124–1134 (2004).      35. Y. Takahashi, G. Schoenbaum, Y. Niv, Front. Neurosci. 2,86–99
                                                                                  (2008).
        ing reward from the VTA (37), enabling adaptation  6. T. D. Barnes, Y. Kubota, D. Hu, D. Z. Jin, A. M. Graybiel, Nature  36. J. O’Doherty et al., Science 304, 452–454 (2004).
                                              437, 1158–1161 (2005).
        of the policy for reentering M1 activity patterns.  7. V. Y. Cao et al., Neuron 86, 1385–1392 (2015).  37. M.W.Howe,D. A.Dombeck, Nature 535,505–510
        Plasticity in ventral striatum (32) could be me-  8. A. J. Peters, S. X. Chen, T. Komiyama, Nature 510, 263–267  (2016).
        diated by strong bidirectional connections with  (2014).                38. M. Fu,X.Yu,J.Lu,Y.Zuo, Nature 483,92–95
        the VTA, enabling adaptation of the auditory  9. B. P. Ölveczky, T. M. Otchy, J. H. Goldberg, D. Aronov, M. S. Fee,  (2012).
                                              J. Neurophysiol. 106,386–397 (2011).  39. T. Xu et al., Nature 462, 915–919 (2009).
        tones’ value.
                                            10. E. E. Fetz, Science 163, 955–958 (1969).  40. A. Hayashi-Takagi et al., Nature 525, 333–338 (2015).
          In addition, VTA stimulation may have in-
                                            11. J. M. Carmena et al., PLOS Biol. 1, E42 (2003).  41. T. Gulati, L. Guo, D. S. Ramanathan, A. Bodepudi, K. Ganguly,
        directly guided motor cortical plasticity. As animals  12. K. Ganguly, J. M. Carmena, PLOS Biol. 7, e1000153  Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1277–1284 (2017).
        acquire motor skills and consolidate cortical ac-  (2009).              42. G. Yang et al., Science 344, 1173–1178 (2014).
        tivity patterns, motor memories are encoded in  13. V. R. Athalye, K. Ganguly, R. M. Costa, J. M. Carmena, Neuron  43. R. C. Williamson et al., PLOS Comput. Biol. 12, e1005141
                                              93, 955–970.e5 (2017).              (2016).
        the formation of lasting dendritic spine ensem-  14. A. C. Koralek, X. Jin, J. D. Long II, R. M. Costa, J. M. Carmena,  44. B. F. Skinner, Science 213, 501–504 (1981).
        bles (8, 38–40). Further, reinforcement guides the  Nature 483, 331–335 (2012).  45. R. M. Costa, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 579–586 (2011).
        reactivation of neurons during sleep (41), leading  15. K. B. Clancy,A.C.Koralek, R.M.Costa,D.E. Feldman,
                                              J. M. Carmena, Nat. Neurosci. 17,807–809 (2014).
        to the formation of dendritic spines (42)aswell  16. W. Schultz, P. Dayan, P. R. Montague, Science 275, 1593–1599  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  Downloaded from
        as the identification of neurons responsible for  (1997).               We thank A. Castro for the motor reinforcement experiments;
        achieving a target pattern (41). Thus, our ob-  17. R. S. Sutton, A. G. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An  A. Koralek, P. Khanna, and R. Neely for helpful discussions;
                                                                                and A. Vaz for animal colony management. This work
        served changes in shared variance could also  Introduction (MIT Press, 1998).  was supported by a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
        reflect sleep-dependent changes in motor corti-  18. E. E. Steinberg et al., Nat. Neurosci. 16, 966–973  to V.R.A.; grants from the NSF (CBET-0954243 and
                                              (2013).
        cal synaptic connectivity. Recent modeling work  19. J. Olds, P. Milner, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 47, 419–427  EFRI-M3C 1137267) and Office of Naval Research (N00014-15-
                                                                                1-2312) to J.M.C.; and grants from the European Research
        shows that excitation-inhibition–balanced spiking  (1954).              Area ERA-NET, European Research Council (COG 617142),
        networks with clustered connectivity exhibited  20. D. Corbett, R. A. Wise, Brain Res. 185,1–15 (1980).  and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (IEC 55007415)
        prominent low-dimensional shared variance,  21. H.-C. Tsai et al., Science 324, 1080–1084 (2009).  to R.M.C. Data presented in this paper can be found on
        whereas nonclustered networks exhibited weak,  22. I. B. Witten et al., Neuron 72, 721–733 (2011).  figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5687101.v1.  http://science.sciencemag.org/
        high-dimensional shared variance (43).  23. S. Gong et al., J. Neurosci. 27, 9817–9823 (2007).
                                            24. L. Grosenick, J. H. Marshel, K. Deisseroth, Neuron 86, 106–139
          Our results provide causal evidence for a neu-  (2015).               SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
        ral law of effect, describing how the brain selects  25. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, D. B. Rubin, J. R. Stat. Soc. B 39,  www.sciencemag.org/content/359/6379/1024/suppl/DC1
        and shapes neural activitypatternsthrough neu-  1–38 (1977).            Materials and Methods
        ral reinforcement. As Skinner noted, selection by  26. B. S. Everitt, An Introduction to Latent Variable Models  Figs. S1 to S12
                                              (Chapman and Hall, London, 1984).
        consequence is a mechanism driving the evolu-                           References (46–49)
                                            27. B. M. Yu et al., J. Neurophysiol. 102,614–635
        tion of living things, from species to societies  (2009).               8 August 2017; accepted 8 January 2018
        to behavior (44). Our results help uncover how  28. P. T. Sadtler et al., Nature 512, 423–426 (2014).  10.1126/science.aao6058  on March 1, 2018

























        Athalye et al., Science 359, 1024–1029 (2018)  2 March 2018                                         6of 6
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102