Page 145 - 111111
P. 145
¥ÿ≈æ“À
√—∞∑’˧¥’‡°‘¥¢÷Èπ«à“„™â¡“μ√∞“π„¥ Û. §«“¡‡ ’ˬß∑’Ë·æ∑¬å‰¡à‰¥â·®âßπ—Èπ‡°‘¥¢÷Èπ®√‘ß Ù. °“√∑’Ë
·æ∑¬å‰¡à‰¥â·®âß§«“¡‡ ’ˬߥ—ß°≈à“«·°àºŸâªÉ«¬∑”„À⺟âªÉ«¬‰¥â√—∫§«“¡‡ ’¬À“¬ „π√—∞ à«π„À≠à
‡°◊Õ∫∑—ÈßÀ¡¥¢Õߪ√–‡∑» À√—∞Õ‡¡√‘°“ πÕ°®“°ºŸâªÉ«¬®–μâÕßπ” ◊∫«à“ μπ‡Õß®–ªØ‘‡ ∏°“√
√—°…“À“°·æ∑¬å·®âߢâÕ¡Ÿ≈§«“¡‡ ’ˬß∑’ˇ°‘¥¢÷Èπ„À⺟âªÉ«¬∑√“∫°àÕπ°“√√—°…“ ºŸâªÉ«¬¬—ß¡’Àπâ“∑’Ë
π” ◊∫Õ’°«à“ À“°ºŸâªÉ«¬√“¬Õ◊ËπÊ ∑’˰ժ√¥â«¬‡Àμÿº≈‰¥â√—∫·®âߢâÕ¡Ÿ≈∑’Ë·æ∑¬å‰¡à‰¥â·®âß·°àμπ
®–μ—¥ ‘π„®ªØ‘‡ ∏°“√√—°…“‡™àπ°—π ¡“μ√∞“π°“√æ‘ Ÿ®π套߰≈à“« Õ“®‡√’¬°«à“ ¡“μ√∞“π°“√
æ‘ Ÿ®πå§«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å√–À«à“ß°“√°√–∑”°—∫º≈„π‡™‘ß«—μ∂ÿ«‘ —¬ (Objective Causation
Standard) ¡’‡æ’¬ß Ù √—∞‡∑à“π—Èπ∑’Ë„™â¡“μ√∞“π‡™‘ßÕ—μ«‘ —¬ (Subjective Causation
(Ú˘)
Standard) ´÷Ëßæ‘®“√≥“‡æ’¬ß«à“ ºŸâªÉ«¬√“¬π—ÈπÊ ®–ªØ‘‡ ∏°“√√—°…“À√◊Õ¬—߇¢â“√—∫°“√√—°…“
À“°‰¥â√—∫·®âߢâÕ¡Ÿ≈®“°·æ∑¬å ·¡â«à“ºŸâªÉ«¬√“¬Õ◊ËπÊ ∑—ÈßÀ¡¥®–μ—¥ ‘π„®„π∑“ßμ√ߢⓡ°Áμ“¡
¡“μ√∞“π„π‡™‘ßÕ—μ«‘ —¬π’È Õ¥§≈âÕß°—∫À≈—°°“√æ◊Èπ∞“π¢Õß§«“¡¬‘π¬Õ¡∑’ˉ¥â√—∫°“√∫Õ°°≈à“«
ºŸâªÉ«¬®– “¡“√∂¡’Õ‘ √–„π°“√μ—¥ ‘π„®Õ¬à“ß·∑â®√‘ß°ÁμàÕ‡¡◊ËÕ “¡“√∂ªØ‘‡ ∏°“√√—°…“‰¥â‚¥¬
‰¡àμâÕß§”π÷ß«à“°“√μ—¥ ‘π„®¥—ß°≈à“« ¡‡Àμÿ ¡º≈À√◊Õ‡ªìπ°“√μ—¥ ‘π„®∑’Ë©≈“¥À√◊Õ‰¡à ºŸâªÉ«¬
‰¡à®”μâÕßÕ¬Ÿà¿“¬„μâÕ‘∑∏‘æ≈À√◊Õπ”°“√μ—¥ ‘π„®¢Õß§πÕ◊Ëπ¡“æ‘®“√≥“ ºŸâªÉ«¬¡’ ‘∑∏‘∑’Ë®–º‘¥„π
“¬μ“¢Õß§πÕ◊Ëπ »“≈Æ’°“¢Õß√—∞‚Õ§≈“‚Œ¡“‡§¬°≈à“«‰«â«à“ çTo the extent the plaintiff,
given an adequate disclosure, would have declined the proposed treatment,
and a reasonable person in similar circumstances would have consented, a
(Û)
patientûs right of self-determination is irrevocably lost.é À√◊Õ·ª≈‡ªìπ¿“…“‰∑¬
‰¥â«à“ çÀ“°¡’°√≥’∑’˺ŸâªÉ«¬´÷Ë߇ªìπ‚®∑°å‡¡◊ËÕ‰¥â√—∫·®âߢâÕ¡Ÿ≈Õ¬à“ßæÕ‡æ’¬ß·≈â« ®–ªØ‘‡ ∏°“√
√—°…“∑’Ë·æ∑¬å·π–π” ·μà∫ÿ§§≈Õ◊Ëπ∑’ËÕ¬Ÿà„π ∂“π°“√≥å∑’˧≈⓬°—π®–¬‘π¬Õ¡‡¢â“√—∫°“√√—°…“
‘∑∏‘„π°“√μ—¥ ‘π„®¥â«¬μπ‡ÕߢÕߺŸâªÉ«¬®– Ÿ≠ ‘Èπ‰ªÕ¬à“߉¡àÕ“®·°â‰¢‰¥âé Jay Katz
π—°«‘™“°“√´÷Ëß¡’™◊ËÕ‡ ’¬ß·≈–¬—߇ªìπ·æ∑¬åÕ’°¥â«¬‰¡à‡ÀÁπ¥â«¬°—∫¡“μ√∞“π‡™‘ß«—μ∂ÿ«‘ —¬·≈–
°≈à“«‰«âÕ¬à“ßπà“§‘¥«à“ ç§«“¡‡™◊ËÕ∑’Ë«à“¡’‡æ’¬ßÀπ÷Ëß§”μÕ∫∑’Ë∂◊Õ«à“√Õ∫§Õ∫À√◊Õ ¡‡Àμÿ ¡º≈
μàÕ∑ÿ° ∂“π°“√≥凰’ˬ«°—∫°“√√—°…“欓∫“≈ ‡ªìπ§«“¡‡™◊ËÕ∑’ˉ√â “√– ∑—Èß®“°¡ÿ¡¡ÕߢÕß·æ∑¬å
(Ú˘)
Tenenbaum, supra note 9, at 716-17.
(Û)
Scott v. Bradford, 606 P.2d 554, 559 (Okla. 1979).
134 ‡≈à¡∑’Ë Ú ªï∑’Ë ˆˆ
134
134
134
134