Page 145 - 111111
P. 145

¥ÿ≈æ“À



              √—∞∑’˧¥’‡°‘¥¢÷Èπ«à“„™â¡“μ√∞“π„¥ Û. §«“¡‡ ’ˬß∑’Ë·æ∑¬å‰¡à‰¥â·®âßπ—Èπ‡°‘¥¢÷Èπ®√‘ß Ù. °“√∑’Ë

              ·æ∑¬å‰¡à‰¥â·®âß§«“¡‡ ’ˬߥ—ß°≈à“«·°àºŸâªÉ«¬∑”„À⺟âªÉ«¬‰¥â√—∫§«“¡‡ ’¬À“¬ „π√—∞ à«π„À≠à
              ‡°◊Õ∫∑—ÈßÀ¡¥¢Õߪ√–‡∑» À√—∞Õ‡¡√‘°“ πÕ°®“°ºŸâªÉ«¬®–μâÕßπ” ◊∫«à“ μπ‡Õß®–ªØ‘‡ ∏°“√

              √—°…“À“°·æ∑¬å·®âߢâÕ¡Ÿ≈§«“¡‡ ’ˬß∑’ˇ°‘¥¢÷Èπ„À⺟âªÉ«¬∑√“∫°àÕπ°“√√—°…“ ºŸâªÉ«¬¬—ß¡’Àπâ“∑’Ë

              π” ◊∫Õ’°«à“ À“°ºŸâªÉ«¬√“¬Õ◊ËπÊ ∑’˰ժ√¥â«¬‡Àμÿº≈‰¥â√—∫·®âߢâÕ¡Ÿ≈∑’Ë·æ∑¬å‰¡à‰¥â·®âß·°àμπ
              ®–μ—¥ ‘π„®ªØ‘‡ ∏°“√√—°…“‡™àπ°—π ¡“μ√∞“π°“√æ‘ Ÿ®π套߰≈à“« Õ“®‡√’¬°«à“ ¡“μ√∞“π°“√

              æ‘ Ÿ®πå§«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å√–À«à“ß°“√°√–∑”°—∫º≈„π‡™‘ß«—μ∂ÿ«‘ —¬ (Objective Causation

              Standard) ¡’‡æ’¬ß Ù √—∞‡∑à“π—Èπ∑’Ë„™â¡“μ√∞“π‡™‘ßÕ—μ«‘ —¬ (Subjective Causation
                       (Ú˘)
              Standard)  ´÷Ëßæ‘®“√≥“‡æ’¬ß«à“ ºŸâªÉ«¬√“¬π—ÈπÊ ®–ªØ‘‡ ∏°“√√—°…“À√◊Õ¬—߇¢â“√—∫°“√√—°…“

              À“°‰¥â√—∫·®âߢâÕ¡Ÿ≈®“°·æ∑¬å ·¡â«à“ºŸâªÉ«¬√“¬Õ◊ËπÊ ∑—ÈßÀ¡¥®–μ—¥ ‘π„®„π∑“ßμ√ߢⓡ°Áμ“¡
              ¡“μ√∞“π„π‡™‘ßÕ—μ«‘ —¬π’È Õ¥§≈âÕß°—∫À≈—°°“√æ◊Èπ∞“π¢Õß§«“¡¬‘π¬Õ¡∑’ˉ¥â√—∫°“√∫Õ°°≈à“«

              ºŸâªÉ«¬®– “¡“√∂¡’Õ‘ √–„π°“√μ—¥ ‘π„®Õ¬à“ß·∑â®√‘ß°ÁμàÕ‡¡◊ËÕ “¡“√∂ªØ‘‡ ∏°“√√—°…“‰¥â‚¥¬

              ‰¡àμâÕß§”π÷ß«à“°“√μ—¥ ‘π„®¥—ß°≈à“« ¡‡Àμÿ ¡º≈À√◊Õ‡ªìπ°“√μ—¥ ‘π„®∑’Ë©≈“¥À√◊Õ‰¡à ºŸâªÉ«¬
              ‰¡à®”μâÕßÕ¬Ÿà¿“¬„μâÕ‘∑∏‘æ≈À√◊Õπ”°“√μ—¥ ‘π„®¢Õß§πÕ◊Ëπ¡“æ‘®“√≥“ ºŸâªÉ«¬¡’ ‘∑∏‘∑’Ë®–º‘¥„π

               “¬μ“¢Õß§πÕ◊Ëπ »“≈Æ’°“¢Õß√—∞‚Õ§≈“‚Œ¡“‡§¬°≈à“«‰«â«à“ çTo the extent the plaintiff,

              given an adequate disclosure, would have declined the proposed treatment,

              and a reasonable person in similar circumstances would have consented, a
                                                                       (Û)
              patientûs right of self-determination is irrevocably lost.é  À√◊Õ·ª≈‡ªìπ¿“…“‰∑¬
              ‰¥â«à“ çÀ“°¡’°√≥’∑’˺ŸâªÉ«¬´÷Ë߇ªìπ‚®∑°å‡¡◊ËÕ‰¥â√—∫·®âߢâÕ¡Ÿ≈Õ¬à“ßæÕ‡æ’¬ß·≈â« ®–ªØ‘‡ ∏°“√

              √—°…“∑’Ë·æ∑¬å·π–π” ·μà∫ÿ§§≈Õ◊Ëπ∑’ËÕ¬Ÿà„π ∂“π°“√≥å∑’˧≈⓬°—π®–¬‘π¬Õ¡‡¢â“√—∫°“√√—°…“

               ‘∑∏‘„π°“√μ—¥ ‘π„®¥â«¬μπ‡ÕߢÕߺŸâªÉ«¬®– Ÿ≠ ‘Èπ‰ªÕ¬à“߉¡àÕ“®·°â‰¢‰¥âé Jay Katz
              π—°«‘™“°“√´÷Ëß¡’™◊ËÕ‡ ’¬ß·≈–¬—߇ªìπ·æ∑¬åÕ’°¥â«¬‰¡à‡ÀÁπ¥â«¬°—∫¡“μ√∞“π‡™‘ß«—μ∂ÿ«‘ —¬·≈–

              °≈à“«‰«âÕ¬à“ßπà“§‘¥«à“ ç§«“¡‡™◊ËÕ∑’Ë«à“¡’‡æ’¬ßÀπ÷Ëß§”μÕ∫∑’Ë∂◊Õ«à“√Õ∫§Õ∫À√◊Õ ¡‡Àμÿ ¡º≈

              μàÕ∑ÿ° ∂“π°“√≥凰’ˬ«°—∫°“√√—°…“欓∫“≈ ‡ªìπ§«“¡‡™◊ËÕ∑’ˉ√â “√– ∑—Èß®“°¡ÿ¡¡ÕߢÕß·æ∑¬å




              (Ú˘)
                 Tenenbaum, supra note 9, at 716-17.
              (Û)
                 Scott v. Bradford, 606 P.2d 554, 559 (Okla. 1979).



              134                                                             ‡≈à¡∑’Ë Ú  ªï∑’Ë ˆˆ
              134
              134
              134
              134
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150