Page 98 - 111111

¥ÿ≈æ“À

and the overall operation of the system, but only a moderate level of

satisfaction with respect to the equipmentfithe design, size, weight,
duration of battery, and time to recharge. Half of the accused who were

surveyed complained about the size of the device. On the part of court

officers they surveyed, the team discovered an extremely high level of
satisfaction on coordination with EMC officers and a high level of satisfaction

on steps, time, and simplicity of the system, but only a moderate level of

satisfaction on equipment. Officers, too, complained about device size, design,

and battery life.

Efficiency

The team adopted two criteria for assessing efficiency: efficiency in

operation and budget reduction. Efficiency in operation was measured by the

cost per unit, the number of arrestees enrolled, steps and time reduced in
operation, and progress according to plan. (Data on the cost per unit and

the number of usage is summarized above, in the section on effectiveness.)

On the issue of the reduction in installation time and time taken to activate
the equipment, the report again showed a success story. Since June 2018,

installation time had been reduced from up to 1 hour to just 15 minutes, while

the activating time had been reduced from 15 minutes to less than 5 minutes.

During the same period, documentation required for the EM bail application

had also been reduced from 6 to 3 documents. The report once again used
the data on the reduced cost per unit to claim the efficiency in budget

reduction.

情¿“§¡ - ‘ßÀ“§¡ ÚıˆÚ 87
87
87
87
87