Page 19 - CBAC Newsletter 2015
P. 19

The Kovács ‘lab’ consists of only one small room with about four or five computers and multiple white boards on the
        opposite wall. The walkway is narrow enough that one can just swing around in a swivel chair to get to the opposite
        side but yet in this space, there is a lot going on. It is here that Dr. Sándor Kovács and members of his research
        group employ multidisciplinary methods of engineering, physics, physiology, clinical cardiology, and the biomedical
        sciences to do their work.



        Motivation for Research


        We are unusual in the sense that we are not really a ‘Lab’ at all, we are a theory group and solve human
        cardiovascular physiology problems encountered in the practice of cardiology using theoretical insights, modeling etc
        and validate those insights/model-based predictions using (primarily) human physiologic data obtained via cardiac
        catheterization, echocardiography or cardiac MRI (at CORTEX)


        I encounter practical, unsolved physiology problems frequently during discussions with colleagues and as part of
        heart function assessment in the cath lab, echo lab and MRI lab.  I am passionate about a causality based, rather
        than correlation based characterization of heart function, through which more accurate and specific diagnoses can
        be made. A causality based approach of diastolic function quantitation also provides an objective method for
        assessing the impact of alternative therapies.


        What are your future goals or what do you expect to accomplish in the next few years?

        Continued investigation of cardiovascular physiology using causality based modeling, amenable to verification using
        human, in-vivo data, and translation of novel methodology for noninvasive imaging.



        Proudest Achievements


        I am proudest of the dozens of doctoral students I have mentored– in physics, BME and MSTPs and capable
        cardiology fellows I have had the good fortune to train and learn from over the years. We were able to clarify the rule
        (a differential equation) that all hearts obey when they fill (all hearts are suction-pumps), thereby advancing the
        method of echocardiography based diastolic function analysis from a descriptive method to a causality based
        method by solving ‘the inverse problem of diastole’.  This insight has led to major new physiologic understanding in
        terms of the ‘constant-volume pump’ attribute of the 4-chambered heart; causality based definition of the reservoir,
        conduit and booster pump function of the atrium; establishing that the volume of the LV at diastasis is the in-vivo
        ‘equilibrium volume’; accurate prediction of the duration of the systolic and diastolic phases of the cardiac cycle as a
        function of heart rate; finding the long sought for solution to the ‘load independent index of diastolic function
        problem’; fractionation of transmitral flow deceleration time into its chamber stiffness and chamber relaxation
        components; and proof that the LV ejection fraction, usually considered an index of contractility or systolic function,
        is in fact, an informative index of diastolic function!  These achievements were facilitated by support of the Cardiac
        MR Lab, directed by Sam Wickline, MD and the staff of the Cardiac Cath Lab at Jewish hospital and BJH.







                                                                                               CBAC Center Heartbeat | 13
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24