Page 427 - ACFE Fraud Reports 2009_2020
P. 427

Initial Detection of Frauds in Small Businesses
                 Large and small organizations often allocate resources differently for anti-fraud measures (see Figure 27 on page 32),
                 and the distribution of detection methods at these two types of organizations also varies. Small organizations (those
                 with fewer than 100 employees) differed most from large organizations in the percentage of cases detected by tip
                 (34.2% and 45.1%, respectively) and internal audit (9.8% and 16.5%); these findings are not surprising, given that
                 small organizations are much less likely to have hotlines or internal audit departments (see Figure 27).


                  Figure 15: Detection Method by Size of Victim Organization

                                                                             34.2%
                                  Tip                                                     45.1%
                        Management Review                  18.8%
                                                       15.3%
                            Internal Audit     8.4% 9.8%  16.5%
                    DETECTION METHOD  Document Examination  2.4%  5.9% 7.3% 8.2%
                             By Accident
                                             6.2%
                       Account Reconciliation

                            External Audit
                                        2.4%
                   Notified by Law Enforcement  1.9%  5.4%
                                        1.9%
                      Surveillance/Monitoring  1.9% 2.8%
                                       1.6%
                              IT Controls  0.9%                                                   <100
                                       1.1%
                              Confession  0.6%                                                    Employees
                                      0.8%
                                 Other  0.4%                                                      100+
                                                                                                  Employees
                                    0%          10%        20%         30%         40%        50%
                                                            PERCENT OF CASES

                 Detection Method by Region
                 Figure 16 shows how frauds were detected based on the region in which they occurred. With the exception of Can-
                 ada, the top three detection methods in each region were tip, management review and internal audit. Latin America
                 and the Caribbean and the Middle East and North Africa were much more likely to have frauds discovered by inter-
                 nal audit than other regions, while also having few or no reported cases discovered by external audit. Western Europe
                 had the highest number of cases detected by notification from law enforcement (6.1%) and by accident (10.2%).



                  Figure 16: Detection Method by Region

                                    United  Sub-Saharan   Asia-  Western   Eastern Europe   Canada  Latin America   Southern   Middle East
                                                                                                  and North
                                                                 and Western/
                                                                                   and the
                                    States  Africa  Pacific  Europe  Central Asia  Caribbean  Asia  Africa
                  Tip               38.4%     42.4%  53.9%  39.8%     53.8%  43.9%    36.8%  54.5%   35.3%
                  Management Review  18.4%    15.1%  11.7%  16.3%     10.3%  19.3%    14.0%  12.7%   15.7%
                  Internal Audit    13.1%     16.3%  10.9%  12.2%     16.7%  3.5%     22.8%  14.5%   33.3%
                  By Accident        8.2%     3.5%   3.1%  10.2%       5.1%  8.8%     7.0%   1.8%     5.9%
                  Account Reconciliation  5.3%  13.4%  6.3%  7.1%      3.8%  8.8%     7.0%   7.3%     3.9%
                  Document Examination  5.9%  2.9%   1.6%   2.0%       1.3%  5.3%     3.5%   1.8%     0.0%
                  External Audit     4.0%     1.2%   3.1%   2.0%       2.6%  3.5%     1.8%   1.8%     0.0%
                  Surveillance/Monitoring  2.5%  2.9%  2.3%  3.1%      1.3%  5.3%     1.8%   0.0%     2.0%
                  Notified by Law Enforcement   2.0%  0.6%  2.3%  6.1%  2.6%  1.8%    3.5%   1.8%     0.0%
                  IT Controls        1.1%     0.6%   1.6%   0.0%       1.3%  0.0%     0.0%   1.8%     3.9%
                  Confession         0.6%     1.2%   1.6%   1.0%       1.3%  0.0%     1.8%   0.0%     0.0%
                  Other              0.5%     0.0%   1.6%   0.0%       0.0%  0.0%     0.0%   1.8%     0.0%


                                                                REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE           23
   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432