Page 562 - ACFE Fraud Reports 2009_2020
P. 562

Case Results



                 Action Taken Against Perpetrator
                 Beyond recovery of losses, punishing perpetrators of occupational fraud can be an important part of the victim orga-
                 nization’s fraud prevention program, as it sends a clear message about management’s anti-fraud stance. Figure 106
                 shows that termination was by far the most common punishment for occupational fraudsters (64.1% of cases). In some
                 instances, suspects received softer punishments, such as resignation (10%) or probation or suspension (8%). How best
                 to handle occupational fraud can vary depending on the circumstances and the best interests of the organization. Still, it
                 is interesting that 5.7% of suspected perpetrators received no punishment.



                 Figure 106: Action Taken Against Perpetrator


                   A CTION TAKEN A GAINST PERPETRATOR
                              Termination                                                         64.1%
                                  Other          11.3%

                        Settlement Agreement    10.7%
                             Permitted or
                        Required Resignation    10.0%
                         Perpetrator Was No
                     Longer With Organization  8.3%

                      Probation or Suspension  8.0%

                            No Punishment   5.7%
                                     0%       10%      20%      30%       40%      50%       60%      70%
                                                              PERCENT OF CASES

                 Fines Against Victim Organization
                 While we generally think of individual perpetrators being responsible for fraud, sometimes organizations are punished for
                 having inadequate controls or otherwise allowing the fraud to occur. For the first time, we asked respondents about fines
                 levied against the victim organization. Figure 107 shows that 8.4% of victim organizations were fined as a result of the fraud.



                 Figure 107: Fines Against Victim Organizations
                                                                     Adding Injury to Injury:
                                                  Received a Fine    Fine Amounts
                                                     8.4%
                                                                     An additional fraud risk for many organizations is the
                                                                     potential that they will receive fines from authorities
                                                                     on top of any fraud losses. For the organizations in our
                                                                     study that received a monetary penalty:

                                                                      15%   of Fines Were $10,000 or Less

                                                                            of Fines Were Between
                                                                      31%   $10,000 and $100,000


                                                                      31%   of Fines Were Between
                                                                            $100,000 and $1,000,000
                                      6.6%  2.9%
                                                                            of Fines Were More
                                                                      22%
                  Did Not Receive a Fine                                    than $1,000,000
                       91.6%


     78           REPORT TO THE NATIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD AND ABUSE
   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567