Page 411 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 411

Diagnostic Imaging   377




  VetBooks.ir



















                       0.65 mm thick                      0.65 mm thick                    2.5 mm thick
                     edge enhancement                   standard algorithm              standard algorithm

























             Figure 3.194.  Effect of slice thickness, algorithm, and window   uniformly gray on the top row. All the images were acquired at the
             on CT image appearance.Transverse CT images through the distal   same time but were reconstructed with different slice thickness and
             third metacarpal bone (top row) and the proximal aspect of the   algorithms as displayed in the figure. The 0.65‐mm‐thick slice with
             proximal phalanx (bottom row). The top row is displayed in a bone   edge enhancement is best at depicting fine bone detail such as
             window (window level [WL] 600, window width [WW] 2,600) and the   small vascular canal (arrow, top left). The ligamentous structures are
             bottom row in a soft tissue window (WL 40, WW 350). Notice how   best defined using a 2.5‐mm‐thick slice with a standard algorithm
             bone detail can be appreciated in the top row, whereas the bone   as illustrated by the appearance of the straight distal sesamoidean
             appears uniformly white on the bottom row. Inversely tendons and   ligament (arrow heads) in the bottom right image.
             ligaments can be appreciated in the bottom row but appear

               conspicuous. This gives a sharper look to the image and     pixels representing the same tissue might display a differ­
             facilitates the identification of fracture lines or small   ent shade of gray. This leads to a heterogeneous, grainy
             osteophytes.                                        image, and subtle changes in signal intensity cannot be
               The approach to soft tissue imaging is different.   recognized. For bone imaging, the key is the high spatial
             Although high spatial resolution and sharp edges gener­  resolution to identify small changes at the surface of the
             ally seem appealing in terms of image quality, they come   bone, and the lower signal‐to‐noise ratio is not an issue
             with the downside of creating a “noisy” image. Signal‐  as a lot of natural contrast is present in the image to
             to‐noise ratio is an important characteristic of an image.   define the margins of the bone. For soft tissue imaging,
             It corresponds to the amount of information in a spe­  however, the emphasis needs to be placed on contrast
             cific voxel that relates to the actual property of the tis­  resolution, rather than spatial resolution. The difference
             sue versus the amount of information that is randomly   between normal and abnormal tissues results in only a
             generated. In a more practical way, in an image with a   slight difference in attenuation of the X‐rays. It is impor­
             high signal‐to‐noise ratio, pixel representing the same   tant to decrease the noise to be able to recognize these.
             tissue will display the same shade of gray. However, if   A standard or “soft” algorithm will avoid the noise cre­
             the signal‐to‐noise ratio is low (“noisy image”), two   ated by the edge enhancement. Also using a larger slice
   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416