Page 22 - GP Fall 2020
P. 22

a high-speed handpiece and a diamond bur  to the study groups, which could have mini-    Dr. Roya  Zandparsa is
        in a manner similar to what most clinicians  mized the biological variation.             a Clinical Professor, Post-
        experience  when delivering  a restoration.                                              graduate Prosthodontics and
        This adjustment, along with the consequent   Physiologic occlusal biting forces were not   Advanced  Education  in
        low-speed polishing, have resulted in the re-  simulated in this study. However, sliding is   Esthetic Dentistry, Prostho-
        moval of the superficial glazing layer from   an essential  component  of a wear testing   dontic Division, Tufts Uni-
        the top of all of the ceramic disks, which   method, as a material is stressed in terms of   versity School of Dental
        may play a role in decreasing the wear of   micro-fatigue  only. This  configuration  has   Medicine, Boston, MA.
        their opposing cusps. 32,33  Few studies have   been shown to build up more homogenous
        also shown that a rough external surface is   forces, and avoid the uncontrolled force im-  Dr. Rabie El huni is an
                                                                                                 Assistant  Lecturer  and
        needed to allow for perfect glazing. When   pulses  seen  in  configurations  that  involve   Clinical  Supervisor
                                                             43
        the antagonist cusp has worn the glazed top   lifting of the stylus.                     in  the  Department  of
        layer, the cusp hits the rough surface of the                                            Prosthodontics, Faculty of
        ceramic  layer, which results in increased   For higher accuracy, both volumetric (3D)   Dentistry at the University
        enamel wear. 32,34,45,54  A meta-analysis of in    and  liner  (2D) measurements  were  per-  of  Benghazi  in  Benghazi,
        vitro  and  clinical  research  indicated  the   formed in this study (Figures 3, 4). The dif-  Libya.
        increase potential  of certain  materials  for   ferences in 2D and 3D rankings of studied
        enamel wear of antagonist teeth and others   materials could be due to the fact that 2D   Dr. Hiroshi Hirayama is
        highlight the between-material variations.    comparisons measure only the height loss at   a Professor at the Boston
                                          53
        Monolithic zirconia as well as convention-  selectable points  on the  longitudinal cross   University  School  of
                                                                                                 Dental Medicine in Boston,
        al porcelain  restorations showed evidence   section  of  the  cusps, putting  the  approach   MA.
        of increased wear potential on the enamel.   under question.
        On the contrary, surface treatment, such as   Laboratory studies on the contact relation-
        polishing of zirconia materials, was found   ship between restorative materials and the
        to  bear  a less pronounced  effect. It  has   opposing enamel  may be helpful for pre-  Mr. Mark Johnson is
                                     53
        been documented that wear increases with   dicting the clinical performance accurately.   the president  of Texture
        the increasing number of cycles.  However,   They may also assist researchers for stan-  Technology Corporation.
                                  24
        in vitro wear test methods demonstrated an   dardizing the wear test parameters so that a
        even linear pattern with a steep increase in   better correlation with clinical circumstanc-
        wear at the initial phase and a flattening of   es can be achieved. However, to date, not
        the curve after. 39
                                              many in vitro or in  vivo studies are avail-  References
        In the present study, the  force exerted  by   able on the comparison of opposing enamel   1. Geurtsen W, Schoeler J. A 4-year retrospective
                                                                                   clinical study of class I and II composite fillings. J
        the cyclic loading device was not controlled   wear among the currently used advanced   Dent 1997;25:229-32.
        during all movements of the natural enam-  ceramic restorations.           2. Bergman MA. The clinical performance of ce-
        el cusps. The force applied by each enamel   Conclusions                   ramic inlays: A review. Aust Dent J 1999;44:157-88.
                                                                                   3. Fischer H, Marx R. Fracture toughness of dental
        cusp on its  opposing disk was only  mea-  Within the limitations of this in vitro study,   ceramics: comparison of bending and indentation
        sured once before the test was run, which   it can be concluded that there were no stati-  method. Dent Mater 2002;18:12-9.
        could be considered as one of the limiting   cally significant differences in liner and vol-  4. Schmalz G. The biocompatibility of non-amal-
                                                                                   gam  dental  filling  materials.  Eur J  Oral Sci
        factors.                                                                   1998;106:696-706.
                                              umetric reduction of natural enamel cusps   5. Sobrinho LC, Cattell MJ, Glover RH, Knowles
        In this study, specimens were not exposed   abraded  against  natural  enamel  surfaces   JC. Investigation of the dry and wet fatigue proper-
                                                                                   ties of three all-ceramic crown systems. Int J Prost-
        to thermocycling or application of constant   and those abraded against evaluated  ce-  hodont 1998;11:255-62.
        temperature.  Heat application  has been   ramic materials by using a newly designed   6. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics
        proven to be effective in some studies, and   wear-stimulating  testing  devices  and an   in dentistry:  historical  roots and current perspec-
                                                                                   tives. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:18-32.
        somewhat insignificant in others. 46-48   How-  electro-mechanical cyclic loading machine   7. Dong JK, Luthy  H,  Wohlwend  A, Schärer  P.
        ever, these studies tested the effect of tem-  in a chamber filled with artificial saliva. All   Heat-pressed ceramics:  technology and strength.
        perature changes on different composite   ceramic systems exhibited high durability,   Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:9-16.
                                                                                   8. McNeill C. Science and Practice of Occlusion.
        materials.  Further  studies  are  required  to   and they were wear-friendly to opposing   Carol Stream, Illinois: Quintessence Publishing Co,
        assess this factor on advanced ceramic sys-  natural dentition.            Inc; 1997. p. 421.
        tems.                                                                      9. Stober T, Dreyhaupt J, Lehnung U, Rammelsberg
                                              Clinical Significance                P. Occlusal  Wear of Metal-Free Ceramic-Filled
        In terms of biological spread, unfortunately   The findings of the current study point to ad-  Polymer Crowns after  2  Years in Service. Int J
                                                                                   Prosthodont 2008;21:161-5.
        this study did not divide the extracted hu-  vanced ceramic systems may be appropriate   10.  Elmaria A, Goldstein G, Vijayaraghavan T,  Le-
        man teeth based on the patient’s age and   choices  for the  fabrication  of full-contour   geros RZ,  Hittelman EL.  An evaluation of wear
                                                                                   when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materi-
        sex.  Such  factors  have  been  proven  to  be   restorations in the oral cavity, since they are   als and gold. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:345-53.
        influencing variables on the process of wear   esthetically appealing, and produce oppos-   11. Krämer N, Kunzelmann KH, Taschner M, Mehl
        of human tooth structure. However, cusps   ing enamel wear similar to that caused by   A, Garcia-Godoy F, Frankenberger R. Antagonist
                             48
                                                                                   enamel wears more than ceramic inlays. J Dent Res
        of extracted teeth were randomly assigned   natural tooth surfaces.        2006;85:1097-100.
                                                                                   12. Kelly JR. Dental  ceramics:  Current thinking
                                                                                   and trends. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48:513-30.
                                                                                   13. Lee A, Swain M, He L, Lyons K.  Wear be-
        www.nysagd.org l Fall 2020 l GP 22                                         havior of human enamel against lithium disilicate
                                                                                                      continued on page 31
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27