Page 31 - GP Fall 2020

eliminate periodontal defects and restore The Effect of Different Dental Ceramic Systems…continued from page 22
the appearance and function of the gingiva. glass ceramic and type III gold. J Prosthet Dent tact. Technical specification 2001; No. 14569.
Discontinuation of the causative medica- 2014;112:1399-405. 36. Heintze SD. How to qualify and validate wear
tion can return gingival tissues to baseline; 14. Hudson J, Goldstein G, Georgescu M. Enamel simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater
2006;22:712-73.
wear caused by three different restorative materials.
however, recurrence of gingival hyperpla- J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:647-54. 37. Heintze SD, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Rous-
sia is to be expected if the offending drug 15. Ramp MH, Suzuki S, Cox CF, Lacefield WR, son V. Round robin test: Wear of nine dental re-
is continued. Koth DL. Evaluation of wear: enamel opposing storative materials in six different wear simulators
three ceramic materials and a gold alloy. J Prosthet – Supplement to the round robin test of 2005. Dent
References Dent 1997;77:523-30. Mater 2011;27:e1-e9.
38. Heintze SD, Zellweger G, Grunert I, Mu-
1. Silverstein LH, Melkonian R. (1993), periodontal 16. Hacker CH, Wagner WC, Razzoog ME. An in vi- noz-Viveros CA, Hagenbuch K. Laboratory meth-
tro investigation of the wear of enamel on porcelain
considerations of dental implantology (Chapter 62). and gold in saliva. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:14-7. ods for evaluating the wear of denture teeth and
Clark’s dentistry. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, pp1-5. 17. Shijo Y, Shinya A, Gomi H, Lassila LV, Vallit- their correlation with clinical results. Dent Mater.
2. Paulo M. Camargo, et al. Treatment of drug-in- tu PK, Shinya A. Studies on mechanical strength, 2012;28:261-72.
duced gingival enlargement: aesthetic and functional thermal expansion of layering porcelains to alumina 39. Powers JM, Ludema KC, Craig RG. Wear of
considerations, periodontology, vol. 27,2001, 131-138 and zirconia ceramic core materials. Dent Mater J Fluorapatite Single Crystals: VI. Influence of Mul-
3. Young PC, Turiansky GW, Sau P, et al. Felodipine-in- 2009;28:352-61. tiple-Pass Sliding on Surface Failure. J Dent Res
duced gingival hyperplasia. Cutis. 1998; 62:41-43 18. Etman MK, Woolford M, Dunne S. Quantitative 1973;52:1032-40.
4. Marshall RI, Bartold PM. A clinical review of measurement of tooth and ceramic wear: in vivo 40. Oh W-S, DeLong R, Anusavice KJ. Factors af-
drug-induced gingival overgrowths. Aust Dent J. study. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:245-52. fecting enamel and ceramic wear: A literature re-
1999; 44:219-232. 19. Clelland NL. Agarwala V. Knobloch LA, Seghi view. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:451-9.
5. Seymour RA, Thomason JM, Ellis JS. The RR. Relative wear of enamel opposing low-fusing 41. Kadokawa A, Suzuki S, Tanaka T. Wear evalu-
pathogenesis of drug- induced gingival overgrowth. dental porcelain. J Prosthodont 2003;12:168-75. ation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin,
J. clin. Periodontal. 1996;23:165-175. 20. Janyavula S, Lawson N, Cakir D, Beck and enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:258-65.
6. Lederman D. Lumerman H. Reuben S. Freedman P, Ramp LC, Burgess JO. The wear of polished 42. Clelland NL, Vaishali A, Knobloch LA, Seghi
PD (1984). Gingival hyperplasia associated with and glazed zirconia against enamel. J Prosthet RR. Wear of enamel opposing low-fusing and con-
Nifedipine therapy. Oral surg. Oral med. Oral path. Dent. 2013;109:22-9. ventional ceramic restorative materials. J Prostho-
dont 2001;10:8-15.
57:620-622. 21. Silva NR, Thompson VP, Valverde GB, Coelho 43. Adachi LK, Saiki M, de Campos TN, Adachi
7. Nishikawa S. Tada H. Hamasaki A, et al. (1991). PG, Powers JM, Farah JW. Reliability analyses of EM, Shinkai RS. Initial enamel wear of glazed and
zirconium oxide and lithium disilicate restorations in
Nifedipine-induced gingival hyperplasia: a clinical vitro and in vivo. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:4S-9S. polished leucite-based porcelains with different fus-
and in vitro study. J. periodontal 62:30-35. 22. Suputtamongkol K, Anusavice KJ, Suchatlam- ing temperatures. Gen Dent 2009;57:363-7.
8. Hallmon WM and Rossmann JA (1999). The pong C, Sithiamnuai P, Tulapornchai C. Clinical 44. Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, Zellweger
role of drugs in the pathogenesis og gingival over- performance and wear characteristics of veneered G, Rousson V. Wear of ceramic and antagonist-a
growth. A collective review of current concept. lithia-disilikate-based ceramic crowns. Dent Mater systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro.
Perio. 2000, 21:176-196. 2008;24:667-73. Dent Mater 2008;24:433-49.
9. Chee WW, Jansen CE (1994). Phenytoin hyper- 23. Filser F, Kocher P, Gauckler LJ. Net-shaping of 45. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations
plasia occurring in relation to titanium implants: A ceramic components by direct ceramic machining. in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes
clinical report. International J. Oral Maxillofacial Assembly Autom 2003;23:382–90. Dent 2001;3:45-64.
implants 9: 107-109 24. Della Bona A, Kelly JR. The clinical suc- 46. Dominici JT, Eleazer PD, Clark SJ, Staat RH,
10. Pihlstrom BL. 1990, Prevention and treatment cess of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc Scheetz JP. Disinfection/sterilization of extracted
of Dilantin-associated gingival enlargement. Com- 2008;139:8S-13S. teeth for dental student use. Journal of Dental Edu-
pend contin Educ. Dent. 11 ( Suppl 14):S506-S510. 25. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for cation 2001:1278-80.
11. Raina Livada; Jacob Shiloah; Calcium Channel dental applications. Dent Mater 2008;24:299-07. 47. Kumar M, Sequeira PS, Peter S, Bhat GK. Steril-
blockers-induced gingival enlargement; journal of 26. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y. CAD/CAM systems avail- ization of extracted human teeth for educational use.
human hypertension, June (2014) 28, Page,10-14. able for the fabrication of crown and bridge resto- Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology 2005:256-8.
rations. Aust Dent J. 2011;56:97-106. 48. Shinogaya T, Bakke M, Thomsen CE, Vilmann
27. Ozer F, Mante FK, Chiche G, Saleh N, Take- A, Sodeyama A, Matsumoto M. Effects of ethnicity,
Dr. Raid Sadda received ichi T, Blatz MB. A retrospective survey on long- gender and age on clenching force and load distri-
his dental degree from term survival of posterior zirconia and porce- bution. Clin Oral Invest 2001;5:63-8.
NYU College of Dentistry. lain-fused-to-metal crowns in private practice. 49. Passos SP, Torrealba Y, Major P, Linke B,
Flores-Mir C, Nychka JA. In vitro Wear Behavior
He has completed a 2-year Quintessence Int 2014;45:31–8. of Zirconia Opposing Enamel: A Systematic Re-
28. Mundhe K, Jain V, Pruthi G, Shah N. Clinical
postgraduate fellowship study to evaluate the wear of natural enamel antag- view. J Prosthodont 2014;23:593-01.
Implantology program onist to zirconia and metal ceramic crowns. J Pros- 50. Esquivel-Upshawa JF, Kima MJ, Hsua SM, Ab-
at NYU, and has been a thet Dent 2015 May 16. dulhameeda N, Jenkinsb, Nealc D, Rend F, Clarka
professor at NYU and at- 29. Preis V, Weiser F, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Wear AE. Randomized clinical study of wear of enamel
tending oral surgeon at St. performance of monolithic dental ceramics with antagonists against polished monolithic zirconia
Barnabas Hospital in the Bronx for over 20 different surface treatments. Quintessence Interna- crowns. Journal of Dentistry; 2018;68:19-27.
years. tional. 2013;44:393-05. 51. Komala J, Reddy TS, Kandhati S, Edulapalli K.
30. Janyavula S, Lawson N, Cakir D, Beck P, Evaluation of wear characteristics of natural teeth
Dr. Aram R. Sadda is a sec- Ramp LC, Burgess JO. The wear of polished and opposing all-ceramic restorations: An in vitro study.
International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences
glazed zirconia against enamel. J Prosthet Dent
ond year oral and maxillo- 2013;109:22-9. 2018; 4(3): 287-292.
facial surgery resident at 31. Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C. Wear of human 52. Pathan MS, Kheur MG, Patankar AH, Kheur
the University of Rochester, enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceram- SM. Assessment of Antagonist Enamel Wear and
Strong Memorial Hospital. ic, and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Clinical Performance of Full-Contour Monolithic
Dent 2014;112:1141-50. Zirconia Crowns: One-Year Results of a Prospec-
32. Amer R, Kürklü D, Kateeb E, Seghi RR. Three- tive Study. Journal of Prosthodontics 2019;28:
body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zir- e411–e416.
conia ceramic after grinding, polishing, and glazing 53. Koletsi D, Iliadi A, Eliades T, Eliades G. In
treatments. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1151-5. Vitro Simulation and In Vivo Assessment of Tooth
33. Park JH, Park S, Lee K, Yun KD, Lim HP. Antag- Wear: A Meta-Analysis of In Vitro and Clinical Re-
onist wear of three CAD/CAM anatomic contour zir- search. Materials 2019, 12(21), 3575; https://doi.
conia ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Jan;111:20-9. org/10.3390/ma12213575
34. Stawarczyk B, Ozcan M, Scmutz F. Two-body 54. D’Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Rondoni GD, De An-
wear of monolithic, veneered and glazed zirconia gelis F. Wear properties of dental ceramics and por-
and their corresponding enamel antagonists. Acta celains compared with human enamel. J Prosthet
Odontol Scand 2013;71:102-12. Dent 2016;115:350-355.
35. ISO. Dental materials-Guidance on testing of
wear. Part 2: Wear by two- and/or three body con- www.nysagd.org l Fall 2020 l GP 31