Page 29 - Resumes.indd
P. 29

Logistics
        Concern on how the program would impact students, faculty and
        staff  our team spent a great deal of time developing a master plan
        and phased logistics plan to best minimize any and all disruptions.


        A major concern of ours was the main steam loop for the campus and
        the high voltage feeds which both ran through the footprint of the
        new building. Due to these factors logistical planning was absolutely
        crucial.  We worked hand in hand with the University to keep the
        steam active by building a support structure as we unearthed the
        main until the new steam bypass was complete.  Th  is was duplicated
        with the high voltage electrical ductbank.  Th  ese temporary support
        structures were critical so we didn’t lose any time on the footings
        and foundation walls.  Another challenge as on most campuses
        was the sheer number of students and faculty that adjacent to the
        project site.  Th  is required moving the fence line and access gates
        throughout the project to ensure the safe fl ow of student and faculty
        traffi  c.  We developed several BIm plans throughout the project that
        were shared with the facilities group as well as campus security as
        well as on the University project website so that any changes were    PROJECT DETAILS
        made known to the campus community.
                                                                        •   Massachusetts Division of Capital Asset
                                                                          Management & Maintenance (DCAMM)
        Schedule                                                          funded project.
        Th  e master schedule while aggressively focused on construction
        also took into account and was coordinated with the University’s
        academic calendar.  Heavy construction activities were limited        •   OSHA Partnership with the U.S. Labor
        during signifi cant events during the school academic year such as    Department to emphasize employee
        student move-in, student move-out and graduation.                 training and an ongoing commitment to
                                                                          identifying and eliminating hazards before
                                                                          they harm workers.
        Th  is project was multi-faceted in almost every way, from the
        complexity of the façade components (over 12 diff erent types of
        materials were used on the façade of the building) to the phasing        •   A high standard of sustainability was met
        requirements set forth by the University. Scheduling played a     through the use of recycled and locally
        distinct and imperative role in the success of this project. Barr &   extracted and manufactured materials,
        Barr created a detailed, task oriented, critical path driven schedule   low-VOC building products, low-mercury
                                                                          fl uorescent lighting, public transportation
        that was reviewed weekly with the University and subcontractors.   access, bike racks, storm water collection,
        Over and above the actual project scope scheduling there was a    solar thermal hot water, natural daylight
        higher level of detail needed within the plan to outline the needs and   and a green roof. LEED Silver certifi cation.
        requirements of the University. Barr & Barr had to be conscientious
        of the University’s school schedule so their yearly program would
        not be disturbed or interrupted. Th  is essential part of the schedule        •   Minimized disruptions to students and
                                                                          faculty occupying adjacent academic
        made it vital for Barr & Barr to develop a plan with the University   buildings, residence halls, and the main
        and stick to it. Th  ere was no room for deviation as the students and   quad.
        the school program needed to continue and could not be disrupted
        by the ongoing construction. Th  roughout the project Barr & Barr
        kept the needs of the University at the forefront and compressed the        •   Aggressive scheduling in order to
                                                                          coordinate and synchronize with
        contract schedule to better fi t their needs. Th  is was done by pushing   University’s academic schedule.
        the subs every day to ensure the schedule was being met and was
        achieved with no additional cost to the project budget.
                                                                        •   Building Informational Modeling
                                                                          was employed for certain aspects of
                                                                          coordination and glazing interface with
                                                                          structural components.
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32