Page 380 - Six Sigma Advanced Tools for Black Belts and Master Black Belts
P. 380

OTE/SPH
 OTE/SPH
                              Char Count= 0
                         3:8
          August 31, 2006
 JWBK119-23
                              Proposed Monitoring Procedure                  365
           Observations (yt)                 Residuals
            10
               A                             4  B                    UCL = +3
            5
                                             2
            0                                0
                                             −2
            −5
                                                                     UCL = −3
                                             −4
           −10
             0  25  50  75  100 125 150 175 200  225  200  205  210  215  220  225  230
                          TIME                             TIME
            CUSUM on Residuals               Maximum Lambda
            30                               5.5
               C                                D
            25                                5
            20  h = 17.75, k = 0.05          4.5
            15                                4
            10                               3.5  UCL = 3.43
            5                                 3
            0                                2.5
            200  205  210  215  220  225  230  200  205  210  215  220  225  230
                          TIME                             TIME
      Figure 23.7 Performanace of SCC, CUSUM on residuals, and λ LS,max in detecting a level shift
      when the residual at the point of shift is large.



      observations come from an AR(1) with φ = 0.9 and mean zero. A level shift of size
      1.5σ Z was introduced at t = 201. Three control charts were drawn to detect change
      in the process level -- SCC, CUSUM on residuals, and λ LS, max .The parameters of
      the three control charts were chosen such that the in-control ARL is approximately
      370.TheSCC(Figure23.6B)didnotdetectthechangewithintheinterval201 ≤ t ≤ 400.
      The CUSUM on residuals and the λ LS, max chart detected the shift at almost the same
      time.
        The second case shows the performance of the λ LS, max chart when the LS results in a
      large residual. The time series in Figure 23.7A was produced by the same process that
      produced the time series in Figure 23.6A. Unlike in the previous case, one can see that
      the LS that occurred at t = 201 produced a large residual. This large residual caused
      the SCC to signal an out-of-control situation. Here, the CUSUM on residuals failed to
      quickly detect the presence of an LS. As can be seen in Figure 23.7D, the λ LS, max chart
      was able to detect the shift at t=201. Using the cases shown in Figures 23.6 and 23.7,
      one can expect the λ LS, max chart to perform better than the CUSUM on residuals or
      the SCC in monitoring autocorrelated processes.


      23.4.3  ARL comparisons
      For various levels of autocorrelation φ and shift δ, we compared the ARL performance
      of λ LS, max and ¯ λ LS with the SCC using Monte Carlo simulation. Note that the shift in
   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385