Page 379 - Six Sigma Advanced Tools for Black Belts and Master Black Belts
P. 379

OTE/SPH
 OTE/SPH
          August 31, 2006
                         3:8
 JWBK119-23
                              Char Count= 0
        364            Statistical Process Control for Autocorrelated Processes
        appropriate control limits. This can be done by first specifying a standard or accept-
        able in-control ARL. A simulation program is then used to determine what control
        limits can be used to achieve this in-control ARL value. For the control chart based on
        λ LS,max , the results of Chen and Liu 35  can be used as starting points for simulation.
        23.4.2  Control chart performance

        For an AR(1) process with φ> 0, when a level shift of magnitude ω LS occurrs at t = d,
        the expected value of the residual at that point in time is ω LS . For t > d, the expected
        value of the residuals becomes (1 − φ)ω LS . Thus, an SCC has a high chance of detecting
        the shift right after it occurs. After this point, the probability of an SCC detecting this
        shift becomes small, especially when φ → 1. An SCC is, therefore, expected to give
        better performance than a CUSUM chart on residuals when the change in level at time
        t = d produces a large residual (e.g. greater than 3 in absolute value). However, given
        non-detection of the change in level by the SCC at t = d, use of the CUSUM would be
        recommended. Thus, both charts have advantages and disadvantages in monitoring
        autocorrelated processes.
          The proposed control chart based on λ LS,t combines the desirable properties of
        the SCC and the CUSUM. It detects both abrupt and small shifts in process level.
        To illustrate this property of the λ LS, max control chart, we have chosen two possible
        cases of LS occurrence for an AR(1) with φ = 0.9 and σ = 1. The first case is shown
        in Figure 23.6. Here the level change did not produce a large residual. The first 200


              Observations (yt)                Residuals
               10                              4
                  A                            3  B                   UCL = +3
               5                               2
                                               1
               0                               0
                                               −1
               −5                              −2
                                               −3
                                                                      UCL = −3
              −10                              −4
                0  50  100  150  200  250  300  350  400  200  225  250  275  300  325  350  375  400
                            TIME                            TIME
              CUSUM on Residuals               Maximum Lambda
              60                               5.5
                 C                                D
              50                                5
                                               4.5
              40
                                                4
              30
                                               3.5  UCL = 3.43
              20  h = 17.75, k = 0.05
                                                3
              10                               2.5
               0                                2
               200  225  250  275  300  325  350  375  400  200  225  250  275  300  325  350  375  400
                            TIME                             TIME
        Figure 23.6 Performanace of SCC, CUSUM on residuals, and λ LS,max in detecting a level shift
        when the residual at the point of shift is small.
   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384