Page 75 - SOP Final
P. 75
A demo should be made available to the set of st
6. Faculty members about those equipment’s Non-teaching staff, 1 week of
Faculty members
functions and specifications from all companies. April
The expert team should clarify all necessary nd
queries including the functionalities, warranty, 2 week
7. Faculty members of
replacements, service backups, compatibility
when changes occur in future and so on. April
A meeting should be organized with Purchase
committee in charge and the expertise to discuss Purchase committee 3 rd week
8. about the outcome of the demonstrations made in- charge and Faculty of
by the members April
companies.
Recommendations are collected by the
purchase committee in Purchase committee 3 rd week
9. charge from the Faculty members and the in- charge and Faculty of
expertise team and the pros and cons are to be members April
discussed.
The Purchase committee in charge may request all Purchase
the companies to give the best revised price again committee in- 4 th week of
10. April
after the demonstrations. charge
With the new revised cost, a comparative
statement has to be prepared and remarks
should be Purchase 4 th week of
11. committee in-
given suitable under each product and the charge and HOD April
minimum cost of different equipment for different
companies should be highlighted.
The Purchase committee in charge should give a
final recommendation for the purchase of the th
12. product based on the feedback given by expertise Purchase 4 week of
committee in-
team. Different products can be from different April
suppliers. charge and HOD
Purchase
The purchase approval along with the comparative st
13. statement is sent to the Management for the final committee in- 1 week of
approval. charge, HOD and May
Principal
Page 65 of 245